Search results

Hi, I'm Steve or Buckers. Been a sparkie for 21 years in every environment possible. My Biggest Gripe is Part P, along with courses to be an electrician/plumber courses in 6 weeks. Foud the site by browsing, keep up the good work.

I had a mistype before the Carriers were BS3036 Semi enclosed

I have, they have documents signed over to their OWN HSE. I was at a loss if the PIR stood any ground obviously not, unless someone is hurt. The other note I thought I'd be getting work to fix/repair circuits but no.... I forgot to mention about the EM Lighting or lack of it

I have locked off most of the factory, was removed from site and hey presto everything is back on by maintenance electricians. Nothing Changed apart from the locks, notices on D.B's and Failure Notices removed, hence why I asked about the legality of the PIR.

So if the 7671 is not law and only recommended guideline, that then throws 2391 and all other qualifications out of the window, if it came to a prosecution. As a test only applies to that date, like an MOT. Defaults can occur after-wards, so if someone was hurt or killed after said date on...

Question: What is the legitimacy of a PIR as I have recently tested a factory and 15 pages later of mainly Class/Code 1 faults. Nothing has yet been done. this was also in the reports not inspected by myself over the last 6 years, we are talking of Manslaughter charges if someone gets hurt...

Thanks for the response. I'll be truthful I don't like the Part P, or the fact some courses say you can be a spark within 7 weeks and House Bash. I have all the old/current Qualifications apart from 2391, which is next on the agenda. I was trying to find more info before I have to throw away...

Hi I am new to the forum and quite impressed. I've been in the game for 20 years and are still learning new things. We have had this argument at work coinciding with Testing and the 17th Edition, with Part P. I have been told by a Tutor in a Lancashire college who deals with City Electrical...