Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Main Forums
Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Question & Answer Forum
bath tub
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steptoe" data-source="post: 9142" data-attributes="member: 7"><p>I have no problem with that,</p><p></p><p>but why o why does the precious BS&amp;^&amp;! (7671)say that is acceptable?</p><p></p><p>I will deffo get the reg for tomoz, was too lazy today cos i tot some1 else woulda had it.</p><p></p><p>I totally agree guys, thats yet another reason that i think 7671 is a load of baby bits!</p><p></p><p>contradictions all over.</p><p></p><p>tho, why would the lighting cpc not be adequate to handle the fault if its good enough for the fault on the lighting circuit?</p><p></p><p>surely the cross bonding and the shower cpc can handle their own respective faults?</p><p></p><p>and the lighting cpc can handle any indirect fault thru its own.? (serious Q there)</p><p></p><p>I reckon someone needs to go to my post on 'sparks own house' and look at how i propose to do my own bathroom. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>dont seem so silly now ? does it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steptoe, post: 9142, member: 7"] I have no problem with that, but why o why does the precious BS&^&! (7671)say that is acceptable? I will deffo get the reg for tomoz, was too lazy today cos i tot some1 else woulda had it. I totally agree guys, thats yet another reason that i think 7671 is a load of baby bits! contradictions all over. tho, why would the lighting cpc not be adequate to handle the fault if its good enough for the fault on the lighting circuit? surely the cross bonding and the shower cpc can handle their own respective faults? and the lighting cpc can handle any indirect fault thru its own.? (serious Q there) I reckon someone needs to go to my post on 'sparks own house' and look at how i propose to do my own bathroom. :D :D dont seem so silly now ? does it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Main Forums
Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Question & Answer Forum
bath tub
Top