It's not compulsory to respond, and we do have jobs to do
If you have a read through the posts on here you will find a very similar post asking the same question. In short, it will work fine, it may also work with a smaller inverter, you can undesize inverters by 20%, which can be an option for split arrays, although I'm not a fan of that practice, reasons given in previous posts. Have a good read, and if you need any further explanation / clarification, ask, and I will try to help.
Hi Binky, sorry if I gave the impression a reply was compulsory, I didn't think that at all, I was just surprised at the 'traffic' on the post without even a "don't be such a muppet that will never work" sort of reply
It's kind of you to offer to help, thanks.
I have been reading through similar threads but didn't understand (sorry old dog new tricks!) I guess I was thinking something like this ...
Two inverters, each receiving power from panels, although levels rising and falling at different times of day according to aspect, so each inverter exports or charges its own battery as it sees fit. (ugh! was that a pun?)
When a load is switched on eg. a 2kW kettle then power is drawn via inverter from panels or from battery depending on PV generation at the time.
When there are two inverters how is it decided where the power comes from - inverter A or B? Do both try to supply 2kW, or do both provide 1kW, or some other ratio, if so, how is it determined and managed? [Barx's inverter to inverter comms link?]
If I understand correctly the interface with the grid is monitored via a CT clamp between the consumer unit and import meter (the electricity meter)
So, both inverters have their own CT clamp and a CT measures current in the cable, the measurement goes to the inverter?
OK, the process could be something like this...
The kettle switch on starts to pull power from the grid initially
Inverter A says to itself, I can give 2kW easy peasy and starts to ... and as they both have a CT clamp so both register the need, so does inverter B supply 2kW too?
OK, so now, IIUC, the currents measured in the CT clamps which measure grid input to house will both drop to zero as power is being provided by inverters, but 4kW is now being sent from inverters to the house?
Worse than this, presuming the measurement is not continuous, it's only done, at a complete guess, at 1Hz, and the timing of measurements of inverters A and B is not synchronised, and there is a lag in the response to the measurements, which might be different for A and B, then something like this might happen vs. time...?
kettle on - grid gives - A measures - - - - A gives - - - A measures - - - - A stops - - - - A measures - - - - A gives
kettle on - grid gives - - - - - B measures - - - - B gives - - - - B measures - - - - B stops - - - - B measures - - - - B gives
------------ggggggggggggggggggggggg22222444444444444444444442222220000000000000000000002222244444
where g = grid supply, 2 is 2kW, 4 is 4kW from A+B, during period of 0 system either draws from grid again or resumes exporting even?
So, the house could be getting an oscillating input from the inverters of 0 to 4kW for a constant 2kW demand?
during periods of 4kW from inverters the CT clamp measurement just knows there's no draw from the grid?
Same situation of a 2420 cycle could occur if supply is from battery A, B instead of PV,
but during 4's could one inverter think it should charge its battery from the other inverter battery output sort of parasitically (sorry not thought through this one properly) and so some sort of see-saw effect occurs between the two batteries?
Apologies if I'm being stupid and wasting everyone's time
I have a job I have to do too (this is much more interesting though!) Thanks for taking the time to educate me. Maybe you should start a PV college and get paid for this!