Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Main Forums
Electrical Inspection & Testing Forum
EICR - Structural Steel Main Protective Bonding
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Timotei" data-source="post: 525848" data-attributes="member: 25363"><p>I believe the 0.05Ω figure comes from GN8.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I take your point regarding the isolation / parallel paths.</p><p></p><p>Question remains whether my continuity measurement of 0.22Ω is sufficiently low to consider it "evidence" of a hidden MPB to the structural steel, or whether I should indeed be recommending a new MPB is installed with clear refrence to its location for future EICR etc?</p><p></p><p>Thoughts / advice welcomed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Timotei, post: 525848, member: 25363"] I believe the 0.05Ω figure comes from GN8. I take your point regarding the isolation / parallel paths. Question remains whether my continuity measurement of 0.22Ω is sufficiently low to consider it "evidence" of a hidden MPB to the structural steel, or whether I should indeed be recommending a new MPB is installed with clear refrence to its location for future EICR etc? Thoughts / advice welcomed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Main Forums
Electrical Inspection & Testing Forum
EICR - Structural Steel Main Protective Bonding
Top