Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Main Forums
Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Question & Answer Forum
NVQ3, How many on here havn't got it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="professional" data-source="post: 178616" data-attributes="member: 1381"><p>They can't say that, they are not saying that and they will not say that.</p><p></p><p>The only real control that the EAS committee has on scheme standards is the entry requirement for NEW entrants, which does not include people moving from one Scheme to another.</p><p></p><p>However - there is great pressure on the Part P Industry to go down the "risk-based assessment" route, which would severely reduce their income from Scheme membership (non-profit making, don't make me laugh!) as they would be forced to separate the membership fee from the assessment fee. People would (quite rightly) expect to pay for an assessment only when they have one and not continue to pay every year to subsidise members who require far more frequent assessments (at no extra cost to said members). This could lead to a division within members of Part P Schemes due to the differing levels of competence that is currently (very conveniently) glossed over.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="professional, post: 178616, member: 1381"] They can't say that, they are not saying that and they will not say that. The only real control that the EAS committee has on scheme standards is the entry requirement for NEW entrants, which does not include people moving from one Scheme to another. However - there is great pressure on the Part P Industry to go down the "risk-based assessment" route, which would severely reduce their income from Scheme membership (non-profit making, don't make me laugh!) as they would be forced to separate the membership fee from the assessment fee. People would (quite rightly) expect to pay for an assessment only when they have one and not continue to pay every year to subsidise members who require far more frequent assessments (at no extra cost to said members). This could lead to a division within members of Part P Schemes due to the differing levels of competence that is currently (very conveniently) glossed over. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Main Forums
Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Question & Answer Forum
NVQ3, How many on here havn't got it?
Top