AJS87
Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2021
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 1
Hi all, first post...
Does a SWA cable incorporating an integral cpc require a protective conductor between the armouring and the earth terminal of metallic enclosure?
I got snagged on this during an NICEIC assessment. I tried to argue the point of conduits and MICC cables relying on joints but it didn't get me far.
GN8 543.2.2 states 'desirable'
Codebreakers state N/A as a defect code.
If the armour acts as the cpc, we always run a protective conductor link.
I've always understood it was good practice as opposed to not meeting regulations?
Does a SWA cable incorporating an integral cpc require a protective conductor between the armouring and the earth terminal of metallic enclosure?
I got snagged on this during an NICEIC assessment. I tried to argue the point of conduits and MICC cables relying on joints but it didn't get me far.
GN8 543.2.2 states 'desirable'
Codebreakers state N/A as a defect code.
If the armour acts as the cpc, we always run a protective conductor link.
I've always understood it was good practice as opposed to not meeting regulations?