Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Main Forums
Electrical Inspection & Testing Forum
Testing Ze on Separate earth rod
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DonClif" data-source="post: 556240" data-attributes="member: 36659"><p>But my understanding would be that you could have the RCD protecting the ring as the protection for the TT'd socket</p><p></p><p>Fair enough, but I state PME due to TNS & TNCS being assumed PME in reference to PEN faults, so I look at it in the same vein as old EV installations.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Customer was told under no uncertain terms that a minimum of 2m would be acceptable to comply with section 702, I considered swimming pools as close as for guidance.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Slabs at the moment, but they did have plans to fit a purpose built deck. But I wouldn't necessarily believe that without seeing it</p><p></p><p></p><p>Plan was to have SWA spurred from an indoor socket in the configuration shown</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Manufacturer instructions, and 702.410.3.4 </p><p>No extraneous parts in the location, if that's what your asking?</p><p>There's a tap, but PVC piping throughout.</p><p></p><p>If there was no mention of a tub I wouldn't have even thought of a spike, as I have done in the past.</p><p></p><p>I definitely need another beer, so I'd say yes, you do to<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🍻" title="🍻" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f37b.png" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DonClif, post: 556240, member: 36659"] But my understanding would be that you could have the RCD protecting the ring as the protection for the TT'd socket Fair enough, but I state PME due to TNS & TNCS being assumed PME in reference to PEN faults, so I look at it in the same vein as old EV installations. Customer was told under no uncertain terms that a minimum of 2m would be acceptable to comply with section 702, I considered swimming pools as close as for guidance. Slabs at the moment, but they did have plans to fit a purpose built deck. But I wouldn't necessarily believe that without seeing it Plan was to have SWA spurred from an indoor socket in the configuration shown Manufacturer instructions, and 702.410.3.4 No extraneous parts in the location, if that's what your asking? There's a tap, but PVC piping throughout. If there was no mention of a tub I wouldn't have even thought of a spike, as I have done in the past. I definitely need another beer, so I'd say yes, you do to🍻 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Main Forums
Electrical Inspection & Testing Forum
Testing Ze on Separate earth rod
Top
