I see a lot of posts asking about notifying different jobs under Part P. I only notify jobs covered by building control inspections. What do you guys reckon , or should I read the Part P Doc again ?
Deke
Deke
Do you mean the work is part of a building permit ie. new build/extension etc.I see a lot of posts asking about notifying different jobs under Part P. I only notify jobs covered by building control inspections. What do you guys reckon , or should I read the Part P Doc again ? Deke
you notify elecsa (or whoever) when you do a part p job. like a additional socket in kitchen, new DB etc... they then send a notice to LABC saying whats done and by who, they also send a certificate to homeownerThanks for that KME , I'm sure I'll have the list, I thought if we were self certifying our work why does the LABC need to know that I have changed someones CU. We have been told that Birmingham Building Control dumps all the Part P input that comes in online, so whats it all about, Alfie? Is it the same system with Corgi ? Do they inform LABC after every gas fire or boiler , any plumbers ?
Won't the LABC be amassing an enormous data bank of this info? Where do they keep it ?
knowing how competent labc are... id be surpriesed if they actually managed to inform IR or any jobs notified....not before the IR have been informed
Grab a cup-o-tea and a slice of cake before reading ..Thats right Ian , new extension, test and fill out cert, building inspector takes a photo copy away, client gets my top copy, I notify ELECSA online , they notify LBC ( again ) .Next job, say, change CU and wiring to new shower. Test and cert to client. End of story. Should I also notify ELECSA and them notify LBC who are not involved ??
Deke
how many seats in the trailer?p.s. I had to go out half way thorough writing this to do Dads Taxi..
I susspect the original master plan would have hoped all sparks join a part P scheme, so LABC dont need to do bo-diddly!Most LABC inspectors I've spoken with hate part P and feel its been dumped on them by central government and would happily get rid of it in a shot if they could.Would be interesting to see some figures to see if safety has been improved or is it just another speed camera scenario (whoops sorry SAFETY camera X( X( )
and every DIYer... think of the amount of VAT they could have got!I susspect the original master plan would have hoped all sparks join a part P scheme,