green-hornet
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2009
- Messages
- 3,741
- Reaction score
- 0
Have you ever done a pros and cons?
You know the type of stuff something you do or want to do, you make a list of everything positive, then everything negative ending in a pros and cons list!
Have you ever tried it with Part P?
Try it, and I bet you end up with more cons than pros.
In other words it is better out of it than in.
Costs less, no one cares anyway, and unless you do anything dangerous you will never ever be prosecuted.
As for competancy, you do not, and never have had to be, regulated by any governing body to prove this.
Ok it may cost for building regulations, but those who are not registered dont notify anyway, so its free
Dont get me wrong I agreed like most others when part p came about, but I like others thought it would be enforced.Sadly it is not.
I did 4 months writing a paper that was due to be a subject of a TV program, before it got hijacked. The main concern that I found was that out of all the surveys and questions put to officials, most authorities would sign off an installation even though no certificate was issued, simply because it was not found to endanger life or property.
Its a bit too late for me this year to test all that I know, but next year on my assesment, if I remember I would like to test this theory to the max.
I believe that if you are an electrician it is impossible for you to fail an assesment, given that all regulations are a guideline and not law.
Providing you have a valid reason for not doing something that is in the regulations, I can find no reason why you should fail.
Lets take one of my earlier posts.
I did two flats where the supply cable was 16mm twin and earth, with no additional earth supplied, after a cu change I decided that the 6mm main bond to water could stay (there was no gas to the flats), my reason for this was that although the regs ask for 10mm, what exactly would be acheived by doing so?
I am taking my assesor on those two jobs, I would love to see what he says, because if he thinks I am wrong, he will have to show me some calcs to prove himself, or I will just call him a numpty like all the rest.
I have inspected a few homes wired by none part p registered companies, and a few that have been, and although I did pick up 13 departures from regulations on one job alone, I could not say that the installation was dangerous so no action was taken.
Just beggars belief.
I would love to hear your views and maybe we should call on the authorities who take our money to actually enforce Part P so we can do our job properly.
You know the type of stuff something you do or want to do, you make a list of everything positive, then everything negative ending in a pros and cons list!
Have you ever tried it with Part P?
Try it, and I bet you end up with more cons than pros.
In other words it is better out of it than in.
Costs less, no one cares anyway, and unless you do anything dangerous you will never ever be prosecuted.
As for competancy, you do not, and never have had to be, regulated by any governing body to prove this.
Ok it may cost for building regulations, but those who are not registered dont notify anyway, so its free
Dont get me wrong I agreed like most others when part p came about, but I like others thought it would be enforced.Sadly it is not.
I did 4 months writing a paper that was due to be a subject of a TV program, before it got hijacked. The main concern that I found was that out of all the surveys and questions put to officials, most authorities would sign off an installation even though no certificate was issued, simply because it was not found to endanger life or property.
Its a bit too late for me this year to test all that I know, but next year on my assesment, if I remember I would like to test this theory to the max.
I believe that if you are an electrician it is impossible for you to fail an assesment, given that all regulations are a guideline and not law.
Providing you have a valid reason for not doing something that is in the regulations, I can find no reason why you should fail.
Lets take one of my earlier posts.
I did two flats where the supply cable was 16mm twin and earth, with no additional earth supplied, after a cu change I decided that the 6mm main bond to water could stay (there was no gas to the flats), my reason for this was that although the regs ask for 10mm, what exactly would be acheived by doing so?
I am taking my assesor on those two jobs, I would love to see what he says, because if he thinks I am wrong, he will have to show me some calcs to prove himself, or I will just call him a numpty like all the rest.
I have inspected a few homes wired by none part p registered companies, and a few that have been, and although I did pick up 13 departures from regulations on one job alone, I could not say that the installation was dangerous so no action was taken.
Just beggars belief.
I would love to hear your views and maybe we should call on the authorities who take our money to actually enforce Part P so we can do our job properly.