Spot the fault

Talk Electrician Forum

Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Andy™

©Resident Geordie™
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
30,744
Reaction score
1,468
Location
S. Tyneside
DSCF6194.jpg
 
oh,

I like the little one way unit,

:)

are we using radio wave earthing on the SWA?

although apart from it looking dog rough and not terminated I really cant see any major issue with no other info.

 
its a submain to house, located in a meter cupboard (small brick building)

the mini CU is for the driveway lighting

SWA to lighting does use a core as an earth. submain is TT with no RCD protection, and no earth to the armour

 
and,

you havent told us that the armour isnt rodded at some other point.

TT does NOT have to be one sole rod at origin, as PME does not always define one sole rod at origin,

the house may, or may not be rodded at the house end.

so apart from it just being DOG ROUGH you havent actually showed a major defect or safety issue IMO

 
so,

apart from the fact there is NO 100mA RCD on the front end and its dog rough terminations,

there is NO other de-facto fault visible.

as I said, the SWA may well be earthed at the other end of the cable.

Im not trying to be twisted, just trying to point out, dont manufacture faults that dont exist.

---------- Post Auto-Merged at 22:17 ---------- Previous post was made at 22:17 ----------

The earth in the Henley Block, where does it go at the bottom of the pic ?
Im assuming A rod

 
Thats well done then, presume its longer than 3 meters ?I love the way the armoured and T&E is terminated.

The earths i think are confusing steptoe - and i have to admit its not that clear!
yes, its longer than 3mtr (probably more like 25mtr)

there is an earth rod below (going to henley). this is the earth to the lighting DB only

 
so,apart from the fact there is NO 100mA RCD on the front end and its dog rough terminations,

there is NO other de-facto fault visible.

as I said, the SWA may well be earthed at the other end of the cable.

Im not trying to be twisted, just trying to point out, dont manufacture faults that dont exist.

---------- Post Auto-Merged at 22:17 ---------- Previous post was made at 22:17 ----------

Im assuming A rod
no earth at other end of armour either. installation has its own rod though

 
so,apart from the fact there is NO 100mA RCD on the front end and its dog rough terminations,

there is NO other de-facto fault visible.

as I said, the SWA may well be earthed at the other end of the cable.

Im not trying to be twisted, just trying to point out, dont manufacture faults that dont exist.

---------- Post Auto-Merged at 22:17 ---------- Previous post was made at 22:17 ----------

Im assuming A rod
no RCD & armour isnt earthed at any point on any cables (although house does have its own rod)

 
no earth at other end of armour either
new information comes to light

---------- Post Auto-Merged at 22:37 ---------- Previous post was made at 22:34 ----------

So what about the SWA then
yes it needs protecting,

but on the original picture are we supposed to guess/assume/know all these things,?

a picture and no info can only be took at face value,

yes, I missed the RCD, but other than that there really wasnt much else technically wrong,

and even the RCD could be omitted if Ra/Ze was low enough,

 
Top