Standard Zs versus no-trip Zs

Talk Electrician Forum

Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

springcrocus

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
588
Reaction score
0
I have to post this in here for a reason...

Standard Zs versus no-trip Zs

Most sparks are aware that a no-trip Zs test will normally return a higher value than a standard Zs test, sometimes giving readings close to or over the tabulated values for the CPD. So, in true Apache style (thoroughly enjoyed the crimps v wagos), I thought I would conduct a little experiment to see how great these differences were.

I had originally planned to just present a table of results but then thought: What the heck, write it in

 
He has his uses that canoeboy, good post and some very good advice from canoeboy in a previous post, as he said nice table.

 
I think you should get your meter checked.

I have an MFT1552 and whenever I do a CU change and carry out (Hi) Zs tests before the change, i also do no-trip tests at the same time to compare the results directly. Except on a few occasions when I've subsequently found faults in the circuits the two Zs readings have never varied by more than 0.05, which I believe to be perfectly acceptable.

 
I think you should get your meter checked.I have an MFT1552 and whenever I do a CU change and carry out (Hi) Zs tests before the change, i also do no-trip tests at the same time to compare the results directly. Except on a few occasions when I've subsequently found faults in the circuits the two Zs readings have never varied by more than 0.05, which I believe to be perfectly acceptable.
It may vary on a meter-to-meter basis, but whenever I've spoken to other sparks in the local wholesalers (it's a right Darby and Joan club here), the general consensus is that no-trip Zs results are always on the high side and considered unreliable.

Anyway, I have already arranged with the homeowner to go back next Wednesday and do some more tests. A mate of mine is bringing his Fluke 1652 and I'm borrowing a Metrel MI 2087. We are going to do the same standard and no-trip tests with both meters and I will post the results up here on Thursday. Lets hope that the changes that Admin is making to the forum tonight do not stop me posting the tabulated data.

 
Any meter properly calibrated should give comparable results, however I am interested in your experiment and will await your results.

 
Don't mention Megger cm500's

default_tongue%20in%20cheek.png


 
Top