There are two circuits in a bathroom. One for the lighting and one for a combi boiler.
The lighting circuit has no cpc and the circuit is protected by an mcb 6 amp B type 60898.
The boiler circuit has a cpc and is protected by way of an 30 m/A RCD FCU.
Zs for this circuit is well within spec.
Main Protective equipotential bonding is in place for the gas and water.
No evidence of supplementary bonding however, the resistance between the cpc of the boiler circuit and all simultaneously accessible extraneous conductive parts is 0.15ohms. This resistance value is also the same between extraneous to extraneous.
The lighting circuit is not having any modifications, however the boiler is being upgraded.
All of the conditions for omitting supplementary bonding from the BRB are not being met so i am a bit confused on how to proceed with this one. Would i need to need to take a supplementary bond up to the luminaire and pull switch?
Observations and recommendations regarding the lack of a cpc will of course be raised and duly noted.
The lighting circuit has no cpc and the circuit is protected by an mcb 6 amp B type 60898.
The boiler circuit has a cpc and is protected by way of an 30 m/A RCD FCU.
Zs for this circuit is well within spec.
Main Protective equipotential bonding is in place for the gas and water.
No evidence of supplementary bonding however, the resistance between the cpc of the boiler circuit and all simultaneously accessible extraneous conductive parts is 0.15ohms. This resistance value is also the same between extraneous to extraneous.
The lighting circuit is not having any modifications, however the boiler is being upgraded.
All of the conditions for omitting supplementary bonding from the BRB are not being met so i am a bit confused on how to proceed with this one. Would i need to need to take a supplementary bond up to the luminaire and pull switch?
Observations and recommendations regarding the lack of a cpc will of course be raised and duly noted.