Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Main Forums
Part P Competent Person Self-Certification Schemes
This new NVQ 3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kme" data-source="post: 210266" data-attributes="member: 113"><p>Until or unless the "NVQ" assessment system is ratified and "de-loopholed" (probably not a real word, but ho-hum<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> ; I will continue to stand by my previous comments.</p><p></p><p>I would appear to be in the minority here, because.........wait for it........I do, indeed hold an "NVQ" qualification (for all the worth it has :slap ) (but don`t tell everyone - they`ll laugh at me again).</p><p></p><p>In comparison the CG236, or 2391; its as much of a joke as the 2392. "Dumbed down" doesn`t begin to cover it.</p><p></p><p>We have members of this forum who have personal and first-hand experience of people passing others` work off as their own, to get accredited on their NVQ - how that proves any sort of competence is beyond me!!!!!</p><p></p><p>N. V. Q. = Not a Valid Qualification IMO</p><p></p><p>And that`s all I have to say about that.</p><p></p><p>KME</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kme, post: 210266, member: 113"] Until or unless the "NVQ" assessment system is ratified and "de-loopholed" (probably not a real word, but ho-hum;) ; I will continue to stand by my previous comments. I would appear to be in the minority here, because.........wait for it........I do, indeed hold an "NVQ" qualification (for all the worth it has :slap ) (but don`t tell everyone - they`ll laugh at me again). In comparison the CG236, or 2391; its as much of a joke as the 2392. "Dumbed down" doesn`t begin to cover it. We have members of this forum who have personal and first-hand experience of people passing others` work off as their own, to get accredited on their NVQ - how that proves any sort of competence is beyond me!!!!! N. V. Q. = Not a Valid Qualification IMO And that`s all I have to say about that. KME [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Main Forums
Part P Competent Person Self-Certification Schemes
This new NVQ 3
Top