Jason Shawcross
Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2016
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
hi all,
i recently did some work for a customer and when quoting i gave them the option of either having a rewire done or just carrying out remedial work and the changes they wanted. they went for the second option as it was more economical.
the work i carried out was the removal of various electrical items and dead end cables and similar things,
i removed the mess of wiring in the garage back to a single socket at the start of the circuit where it entered the garage (the garage is connected to the house) and replaced it with a metal clad socket then added two more in a radial, fused spur for lighting and a fused spur for the boiler.
upstairs i replaced the light fittings, added new cable in between them, moved two sockets and spured a shower from the sockets (shower was heated from central heating but it had lights and a controller)
outside i took the feed from the shed (the shed was disconnected) and terminated it into an adaptable box where it came out the house and used that circuit to feed the outside lights.
i also changed the sub board in an out building and reinstalled two circuits.
however they he had an electrician come in to do their kitchen and the electrician has told them that i should have upgraded their consumer unit to a metal board. as far as im aware since i have only modified the circuits and not added any additional circuits to that board it is fine as is and doesnt "require" an upgrade and the regulations aren't retroactive in this case, am i correct? (the original board is dual rcd plastic) also the room which they are turning into a kitchen has a separate socket circuit in there and a supply to an electric shower which could be used to supply a cooker instead so i cant see a new consumer unit being required in that case either so is the new electrician just trying it on to get more work at their expense?
i recently did some work for a customer and when quoting i gave them the option of either having a rewire done or just carrying out remedial work and the changes they wanted. they went for the second option as it was more economical.
the work i carried out was the removal of various electrical items and dead end cables and similar things,
i removed the mess of wiring in the garage back to a single socket at the start of the circuit where it entered the garage (the garage is connected to the house) and replaced it with a metal clad socket then added two more in a radial, fused spur for lighting and a fused spur for the boiler.
upstairs i replaced the light fittings, added new cable in between them, moved two sockets and spured a shower from the sockets (shower was heated from central heating but it had lights and a controller)
outside i took the feed from the shed (the shed was disconnected) and terminated it into an adaptable box where it came out the house and used that circuit to feed the outside lights.
i also changed the sub board in an out building and reinstalled two circuits.
however they he had an electrician come in to do their kitchen and the electrician has told them that i should have upgraded their consumer unit to a metal board. as far as im aware since i have only modified the circuits and not added any additional circuits to that board it is fine as is and doesnt "require" an upgrade and the regulations aren't retroactive in this case, am i correct? (the original board is dual rcd plastic) also the room which they are turning into a kitchen has a separate socket circuit in there and a supply to an electric shower which could be used to supply a cooker instead so i cant see a new consumer unit being required in that case either so is the new electrician just trying it on to get more work at their expense?