You need to send those photos to his scheme ..... I would
That won't make a scrap of difference...
Unless you are the person ordering the work and raising a formal complaint, all they can do is look at the pictures and say oh yes.. the standard of workmanship is a bit naff!!
They could possibly use photos in rouges gallery of naff workmanship articles...
BUT.. you wont see any action been taken, Unless you are the person who has paid for the work and you are making a personal formal compliant...
I have recently done some remedial work for a customer who's had some dangerous electrics done....
But the customers contract was with the builder.. not the electrician...
They have raised a compliant with trading Standards, but they cannot complain directly about the electrician as they don't have a contract with him..
I cannot complain about the electrician either..
But Trading Standards have contacted me to be a witness on behalf of the customer to bring a case against the builder for sub-standard work by him or his sub-contractors...
Hopefully the electrician will get caught into the net via the builder...
Even though it is 100% naff non-compliant with BS7671 or Part P (e.g. No 30ma RCD protection anywhere on new two story extension built and wired during the past 18months)..
I cannot complain or raise a case against anyone... because I didn't order or pay for nay work!!!
It is very hard to prove somebody actually did some poor quality work ..
unless you actually have copies of invoices identifying a specific schedule of work and a request for payment as the work is now complete.
A contractors sticker on the front of a fuse box doesn't prove anybody actually did anything at all,
Just that they may have done something somewhere on the installation....
Which is not quite the same!!! :mellow: :shakehead
So if you are just sending photos, you may as well... headbang
Guinness
