Why would LV be cheaper to run?Lv for me , more crisp whiter light, cheaper to run and the lamps last longer.
I'm with you on that - how these lights are deemed to be more energy efficient than the 100w filament lamps is beyond me. In some bathrooms and kitchens it's like putting a radiator in the ceiling! However - as always the customer gets what they want!For halogen I will generally use snaplite as they seem best on market for gu10will only use jcc low energy megaman or similar. I personally think standard gu10's are a waste of time due to light output but thats just my opinion.
Not sure why that would be as an example fitted four downlights in my daughters bedroom about five years ago in that time have replaced only one lamp and never any transformers they were only cheap fittings also. My general take on 240 volt ones from customers the lamps only last for very short time. I am not saying you do not get problems with low voltage because you certainly can but generally it will be because of insulation but this can be improved by using alutech lamps. Over the years I have fitted hundreds of low voltage and have rarely had problems although some of the IBL fire rated ones have been a problem with burnt out lampholders but this generally will be because people have used standard dichroics rather than alutech lamps. As said I am moving more towards low energy stuff these days apart from bathrooms were I use snaplite low voltage.I always go for 240v. The cheaper lamps are somewhat yellow, but I always fit the new xenon filled ones from Osram, they are 40W (50W equivalent) and give a good white light.I've replaced no end of 'blown' transformers and even had a couple of customers ask me to get rid of them cos they're fed up of them failing (and it's not always the cheap ones either).
Enter your email address to join: