PV installer standards slipping?

Talk Electrician Forum

Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

dave2

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Location
Co.Durham
Thought I would post this pic of PV install 2 weeks ago by others. This is the feed back meter.

IMAG0030.jpg

 
It beggars belief as this is just basic installation methods not being done correctly.

Who is monitoring these muppets?

Are they doing this on every install?

 
Obviously the installer does not know you can get an extended cover for most meters to house the connections.
or a bit of 2x2 trunking

It beggars belief as this is just basic installation methods not being done correctly. Who is monitoring these muppets?

Are they doing this on every install?
cos they dont know any better

no-one it seems

looks like a lot of them are

 
Its becoming more the norm - as the price of kit drops, the companies behind the installs try to maximise their profit margins; so they cut down on the quality of the workers - so this carp is becoming more & more commonplace, unfortunately......

 
Obviously the installer does not know you can get an extended cover for most meters to house the connections.
It beggars belief as this is just basic installation methods not being done correctly. Who is monitoring these muppets?

Are they doing this on every install?
Aye - If memory serves, he`s a roofer by trade :slap
at least he has a trade,

not like most of the numpties doing it, and the 5WW that think they have are by far the worst,

standing trying to argue the it out cos they have a bit of paper! : headbang

 
We always use 6mm tails (Proper tails - double insulated) from AC iso to meter into CU, looks neat, tidy and safe. Use SY for run from AC at inverter to AC at CU all glanded.

Adds only a few pounds too install- we are still making good profit, six installs waiting to complete even with FIT reduction, all recieved because of +ve feedback.

Don't cut corners for the sake of a few bob and a few minutes!

 
It is fraudulent for the following reasons.

The installer has certified it compliant with building regs, BS7671, & MCS requirements, it does not comply, thus the installer has lied on their paperwork, thus, they have obtained money by deception, i.e. fraud.

The home owner is fraudulently claiming FITS no doubt for a non compliant installation, again fraud, even though inadvertent perhaps.

Nevertheless money has been and is being obtained by deception, is that not fraud?

 
It is fraudulent for the following reasons.The installer has certified it compliant with building regs, BS7671, & MCS requirements, it does not comply, thus the installer has lied on their paperwork, thus, they have obtained money by deception, i.e. fraud.

The home owner is fraudulently claiming FITS no doubt for a non compliant installation, again fraud, even though inadvertent perhaps.

Nevertheless money has been and is being obtained by deception, is that not fraud?
No meter extended cover and no meter seal

I reckon hanging is to good for that installer

I will call the MCS police tonight

 
Top