Dairyspark
Member
Just watched one of those videos from college that shows you how to test, and on said video (sponsored by NICEIC
I knew there was an easier way of saying what I didhe is right in that it is live working, and EAWR does state live working should not be done if other alternatives etc, which there is. you could do Ze though, since its unreasonable to do it dead, and its reasonable to do it live.
in reality though, many will do a Zs with the test probes on whatever terminals
and the day you forget to terminate the CPC at the CU you leave the circuit unprotected. Doing a Zs is the only way to ensure compliancePersonally I don't Zs test a lighting circuit,,, Zs=Ze+(R1+R2) is a perfectly acceptable alternate method
I think when safety is an issue forgetfulness is never an option. The only time the cpc would be disconnected is during the continuity and insulation test stages. As this involves all connections to be disconnected I fail to see why anyone would connect two cables ( in any order) and forget to connect the third.and the day you forget to terminate the CPC at the CU you leave the circuit unprotected. Doing a Zs is the only way to ensure compliance
Does this apply to Tony fricking Cable?remember,
being a member of NICEIC does NOT mean you are a competent person,
merely that you have met their membership requirements.
Enter your email address to join: