Strange response for a forum where people tend to try and give advice. Will have to remember that line.
I forgot the smiley Graham!
If you read the post I did go on to try and suggest things, and I'm about to go on further.
It seems to me that, quite often these days you post to have a pop at me, do you have a problem with me?
---------- Post Auto-Merged at 06:43 ---------- Previous post was made at 06:34 ----------
Sellers,
Yes 710, IS medical locations.
If the install was after 1/1/12 then this would apply.
If it is before then the requirements were only guidance.
You could equally apply the requirements of 702 by all means.
However, are the customers not undergoing cosmetic treatment?
I would suggest so, in which case it could be regarded as cosmetic surgery, thus 710 will apply.
How much actual leakage current is there?
You should be able to get this easily by clamping your additional earth.
It may need some communications with more than the manufacturer, I would suggest an enquiry with the ESC is in order, or at least your scam registrar, perhaps even Trading Standards.
If these units are this leaky after such a short time, or were they so when new?
Is it individual cumulative?
Which device is causing the leakage?
What will they be like in a few more weeks/months/years?
One would hope that your additional bond will keep the voltage down, however, one could loose the means of earthing, etc. etc.
How is the TN-S earth connected?
What is the Ze & the R2's on the circuits & bonding?
Remember that 30mA can kill!
As you have been called in as the competent person, I would suggest you take a long hard look at what is going on and prepare a detailed engineering report to your client as this could be a lethal situation.