"Specialist" Contractors

Talk Electrician Forum

Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

UNG

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
939
Reaction score
488
Location
Nr Wigan
I have had it a few times recently where "specialist" contractors fell way short of their title

The most recent one was at the local church my wife is on the PCC and since the church warden found out I was an electrician a few years ago I get asked to review some of the testing work carried out at the church

This year it was the lightning conductor test it returned a fail and the church warden asked for my opinion as last year and extra rod was installed to bring the rod resistance down below the required 10Ω the installation of this rod certainly didn't follow the recommendations but the resistance was brought down to just below 8Ω so it was ok, so this year the test was carried out and returned a reading of 164Ω which rang some alarm bells with the church warden so I was asked for my opinion as to why the resistance had significantly increased so I asked how the test was done the church warden explained that the tester had stuck some "tent pegs" in the graveyard and tested to the downlead test point he was asked why he didn't test at the rod in the inspection pit and the reply was it didn't matter where you test the fail cert and quote arrived a few days later the quote was to install a 600 x 600 copper lattice mat encased in marconite earthing compound at a cost of £660.20 + VAT which sounded extremely cheap to me for the cost of the materials and the labour. So a day or so later I had a spare hour in the afternoon and went to the church with my earth rod test kit the result at the downlead was much the same as on the cert but testing at the rod the resistance was 8.2Ω, testing from the rod to the downlead test point gave little or no continuity. The church warden raised a complaint with the testing company about their test methods and they sent out their compliance manager who after testing again agreed with me and told the church warden that he needed to modify and update their procedures and make changes to the training manual so this didn't happen in future, they sent another quote for reconnecting the downlead to the rods of £250 + VAT which I thought was a bit expensive for no more than 400mm of copper tape and a small excavation 50mm wide and 150mm deep after talking it through with the church warden I told him I would install the tape as I felt the contractor could no longer be trusted so about 10 days ago I had finshed a job early and went and dug to install the new tape the strange thing was having dug a little bit of tarmac and into some cement I found a piece of loose copper tape that was connected to the rods but had never been connected to the downlead so it now begs the question how long it had been like this and why it had never been picked up before but then again having now looked at the rest of the LPS and the state it is in and a lack of a complete set of results for each yearly test it is clear that it has never been tested and reported properly for (if you pardon the expression) god knows how long

While not so specialist back in December 2019 it was the EICR carried out by an NICEIC contractor recommended by the Wigan church group it was a total farce had 2 observations one of which wasn't valid as no switches on socket outlets isn't worthy of mention off the top of my head I could think of 5 or 6 things that didn't get mentioned. I ended up with three and a half days work for 2 of us which amounted to 2½ pages of remedials to sort out not including getting the DNO in to replace the double pole fused service head and all the 951 earth clamps on the PILC incomer. After I had fixed all that I had a look through the available PIR's / EICR's since 2000 the last decent PIR was back in 2004 / 2005 when a lot of remedials were done since then they all looked like copies and even the 2005 one was questionable with some of the issues we found in 2019 / 2020
Back then the church warden had been informed that the group overseeing the Wigan churches had created a list of preferred contractors that they expected the churches to use, while I was fixing the LPS issues I was asked to book in the next EICR for January I asked about the preferred contractor thing and was told that following the LPS testing issues he had done away with all that nonsense at a recent church wardens meeting

My last experience installing LP Systems was 30+ years ago and testing them on comms sites was just over 20 years ago where I found a number of supposedly certified LP systems that did not meet the necessary requirements to give a clean bill of health and issue a cert so contractors not delivering is not new

So how many more of these "specialist contractors" are failing to live upto the customers perceived expectation that they are getting the correct and proper testing and certification and meeting their duty of care. Until someone with some knowledge questions what these contractors are doing when they are on site they will carry on regardless and get away with it
 
There's a lot of overheads running MCS, but anything took wise with solar written on them is triple the price. MC4 crimpers £200 for example.
The one that irks me at the moment is people keep posting very high quotes to have an ASHP installed. Typically £6K or more even after the £7500 BUS grant has been subtracted.

Then today someone posted a quote of just over £8100 with no grant (not eligible) So I posed the question, if the true raw price is £8100, then why is nobody being quoted £600 after deducting the £7500 BUS grant?
 
Supply and demand, simples! 😁

The trouble with grant systems is a shed load of paperwork, followed by slow payment for work done, ie months. So you have to be able to carry debt for months, which is difficult, but that still does not justify the overcharging for the work. Most of my profits from solar was in the vat rebates on materials, due to the tax system, that could be 3 months to land in the bank. So I used to charge enough to cover costs plus labour, and enough to put food on the table , and was significantly cheaper than bigger companies. But I've always run my business on a make enough money to earn a reasonable living basis, rather than max profits. That has worked well for me, but many others see profits as the ultimate goal. I sometimes think I should have emulated that a bit more, my main competitors are still going strong, but most of them started with far more money...
 
Anything mention "MCS" seems to just mean "double the price"
But all they seem to be are outfit that causes bloating of prices by their position in the market and business model. Placing restrictions and limits on what "approved" materials can be used to complete an installation IMO is a restriction of trade and then raises questions regarding price fixing of equipment then add the third party assessment and you have to asking what benefit are they bringing to the market
 
The one that irks me at the moment is people keep posting very high quotes to have an ASHP installed. Typically £6K or more even after the £7500 BUS grant has been subtracted.

Then today someone posted a quote of just over £8100 with no grant (not eligible) So I posed the question, if the true raw price is £8100, then why is nobody being quoted £600 after deducting the £7500 BUS grant?
Similar was said about the grant scheme for EV chargepoints where the time taken to produce / process paperwork that needed to be submitted and the reported 6 week or more wait for payment of the grant swallowed up a large chunk of it
 
MCS also seems to be eating up scheme/scam assessor time like nobody’s business.
My Napit renewal was in July. Earliest assessment possible is December 18th! I was chatting to the assessor yesterday on the phone as his workload has increased by 40% and a lot apparently due to MCS.
 
MCS also seems to be eating up scheme/scam assessor time like nobody’s business.
My Napit renewal was in July. Earliest assessment possible is December 18th! I was chatting to the assessor yesterday on the phone as his workload has increased by 40% and a lot apparently due to MCS.
The MCs assessment is an all day event, I think the quickest I ever managed was 6 hours, and I was MCs registered for 10 years. The paperwork system is a full ring binder of documents. In short it's like running a large company.
 
But all they seem to be are outfit that causes bloating of prices by their position in the market and business model. Placing restrictions and limits on what "approved" materials can be used to complete an installation IMO is a restriction of trade and then raises questions regarding price fixing of equipment then add the third party assessment and you have to asking what benefit are they bringing to the market
You have to remember we are fitting power generation on a roof with the potential for severe consequences like fire or panels flying off in a gale. You would not want Mickey mouse gear being used. No different to general electrical gear which all has to meet CE and other standards. Prices of gear have dropped significantly, we were definetly being overcharged by wholesalers when PV first became popular. However, with no FiT payments, there is no need to be MCs registered, just ' competent' to fit the gear. Hence all the DIY installation questions we had during the energy crisis.

MCS themselves are just a profit making quango, hence when membership plummeted after the FiT finished, they tried to stick their nose into EV charging and other technologies, claiming it was for the public benefit...
 
So I think we can all agree that the system is broken, if the MCS requirements add so much extra work to a job, that the extra work eats up the grant money paid by the government, so the consumer gets their ASHP no cheaper and the contractor ends up with all the grant money to cover the extra work with MCS creaming a lot off that.

Why does any government grant scheme end up not benefiting the customer but instead restricts choice of who to can do the work, causes extra paperwork and hoops to jump through and just makes more money for the "special" contractors and their scheme supervisors.
 
Top