deleted. Wrong thread!
Last edited by a moderator:
No , nothing at all , British history , as taught in schools , is selective to say the least .Just out of interest as I didn’t grow up in the UK, do they teach much about the slave trade?
What I thought wrong was that history lessons I recall stopped soon after the middle ages and concentrated mostly on kings and queens etc which meant nothing to me. I don't think we ever got to the industrial revolution. We never came close to anything our parents or grandparents had experienced in the two world wars, or anything I could relate to in the history which surrounds us in buildings, etc.
I dropped history as soon as I could, so perhaps I missed the best bits!
I now find local, technical and industrial history fascinating but I still don't give a damn about lists of dates for kings or how many wives they had.
While I agree with your comments there is a PC minority of society that wouldn'tProblem with History - that its happened and you can't change it.
You can learn from it, you can't "remove" it and you can't rewrite it.
The bible is the best example of this
That's my view and my tin hat is firmly on
It is a pity that Eric Blair died 70 years ago as I would like to know what his thoughts would have been on the current world situation given that aspects of some his books are getting closer to reality with everyday that passes
Those are my feelings exactly . The obsession with the dates I found irksome ...as I can never remember numbers anyway . I'm talking about all boys Secondary Modern School here , Grammer schools were somewhat better methinks.What I thought wrong was that history lessons I recall stopped soon after the middle ages and concentrated mostly on kings and queens etc which meant nothing to me. I don't think we ever got to the industrial revolution. We never came close to anything our parents or grandparents had experienced in the two world wars, or anything I could relate to in the history which surrounds us in buildings, etc.
I dropped history as soon as I could, so perhaps I missed the best bits!
I now find local, technical and industrial history fascinating but I still don't give a damn about lists of dates for kings or how many wives they had.
When you boil it down , world history is about lots of people killing lots of other people .
and then justifying it..... it was my land your brother /uncle/ king promised it to me. I saw it first, sausage sucking, cheese eating, surrender monkees don't deserve it! You worship the same god in a different way to me and your way is wrong, etc etc.When you boil it down , world history is about lots of people killing lots of other people .
there black. racist if you do anythingsubject matter aside, for now. why has no one, not on TV in the media or anywhere, condemned the masses of people for breaking lockdown rules. No meeting in groups of 6 or more and 2 metres apart. Everyone at those protests should be getting a hefty fine. Or is that racist?
The bible is a poor document for it has been re-written many times. There was somthing like 70 gospels originally, hence the differnt forms of Christianity that exist such as the Coptic Christians. The currentt bible was re-written by King Charles with an emphasis on his dvinity ie he was given the right to rule by god - pure propoganda, and a point I like to throw at anyone who claims the bible is the 'truth'.
All nations colour history teaching to suite their needs. The Vikings is a good example as pointed out by Sweedy. Another little known fact is that the British army has lost more battles than it has ever won. Most of our history teaching suites Empirical behavious we would now regard as genocide, theft and murder. This shoule be taught, along with a greater emphasis on how international relations affected technology, trade and many other things.
And usually caused by Religion, assets, landWhen you boil it down , world history is about lots of people killing lots of other people .
You would need to read 1984 and possibly Animal Farm to better understand my comment. While I would like to think state control will never happen the world seems to be under the influence of the PC brigade who want to change anything that may offend or has offended in the pastI had to google him!
Never read 1984 but I don't think we are near his views , but if people want to avoid the "state" control , pretty much the only way to do this, is live and work off the land, only use cash and never pay any bills and / or loyalty cards or have a phone with a contract..... but unregistered phones can still be tracked.
But KIng James tweaked it to suite his needs, did he not?Actually it is and has been proved to be historically accurate. There were many collections of writings, and yes things like the 'Gospel of Thomas' gets wheeled out to try and disprove Christianity from time to time. The fact is the early church fathers who put together the books of the bible rejected those that did not meet certain criteria. That's why the protestant bible has no apocryphal writings included but the caholic bible does. Its not as cut and dry. The King James Bible or Authorised version was in fact brought out (but not written by) King James in 1511.
Enter your email address to join: