chrisg1979
Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2011
- Messages
- 74
- Reaction score
- 0
On a recent c/u change I found that what had been a 6.0/2.5 cooker circuit has had its switch converted to a 2g sckt and had 3 further points spurred from it in 2.5 (1g sckt, cooker hood fcu and under cupboard lighting fcu).
The circuit was placed on a 20A MCB and deviations noted on test sheet.
Now my QS is claiming that the 2.5 cannot be connected to a 6.0, as if in future the customer wants it to be swapped back to a cooker circuit then the 2.5 would be underrated for a 32A MCB.
My argument is that anyone carrying out such work should be competant to do so and would not connect up the 2.5, or run in a new cooker circuit/feed for the rest. I know its not an ideal scenario but all the wiring is adequately protected as it currently stands.
Just wondered what anyone else's opinion is?
The circuit was placed on a 20A MCB and deviations noted on test sheet.
Now my QS is claiming that the 2.5 cannot be connected to a 6.0, as if in future the customer wants it to be swapped back to a cooker circuit then the 2.5 would be underrated for a 32A MCB.
My argument is that anyone carrying out such work should be competant to do so and would not connect up the 2.5, or run in a new cooker circuit/feed for the rest. I know its not an ideal scenario but all the wiring is adequately protected as it currently stands.
Just wondered what anyone else's opinion is?