Mikron,
You do realise that you are personally legally both responsible & liable for the work you have done.
I appreciate that you have misunderstood, however, in this case you should not have taken the work on if you did not fully understand the situation, which it is patently true from your posts you did not.
You have changed the protection characteristics of the circuit protection it seems, without any verification if this is still suitable.
Should the property burn down, or someone get killed, then you as the "last man standing" as it were, will be liable, and the insurer will be looking for someone to blame, and get their money from, that will be you, unless you can prove your competence and the "process" that you went through was in accordance with industry practice to do this work.
It seems that you could have left yourself wide open here, and could also have put lives & property in danger.
You do realise that you are personally legally both responsible & liable for the work you have done.
I appreciate that you have misunderstood, however, in this case you should not have taken the work on if you did not fully understand the situation, which it is patently true from your posts you did not.
You have changed the protection characteristics of the circuit protection it seems, without any verification if this is still suitable.
Should the property burn down, or someone get killed, then you as the "last man standing" as it were, will be liable, and the insurer will be looking for someone to blame, and get their money from, that will be you, unless you can prove your competence and the "process" that you went through was in accordance with industry practice to do this work.
It seems that you could have left yourself wide open here, and could also have put lives & property in danger.