Sounds very old school to me, but I do very little industrial stuff.
Difference between "Single pole with switched neutral" AND "Double Pole" ?
- Thread starter michael8554
- Start date
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
nicebutdim
Active member
Never seen a 2 phase supply over here.
you have never used a 110V centre taped transformer for site tools?
nicebutdim
Active member
I mean two phase supply to a premises.
mainline
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2022
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 73
That isn't 2 phases, it's two halves of the same 110V single-phase.
caught me, yes its not two phase, but it is a double pole supply,
nether have I ,normally 3 phase then split up at the DB (into 3 phase circuits, 2 phase circuits and single phase,)
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2008
- Messages
- 14,663
- Reaction score
- 1,364
erm... there are various single module, Live & Neutral switched, (what I understood as "Double pole"), RCBO's available in the UK..
e.g. Crabtree Starbreaker RCBO's switch the neutral as well!
https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/CB61slashBM3230.html
"Starbreaker Miniature RCBOs with switched neutral built in as standard will fully isolate a faulty or damaged circuit by disconnecting live and neutral conductors."
And MK Sentry:-
https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/pro...1-module-b-curve-6ka-30ma-type-a-compact-rcbo
"The MK Sentry range features neutral switched type double pole RCBOs in one module format."
etc.. etc.. google should offer other options..?
nicebutdim
Active member
Those single module RCBOs do switch both poles, but are distinctly different from double pole devices. This thread was started to discuss that very issue and early posts highlight the difference.
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2008
- Messages
- 14,663
- Reaction score
- 1,364
Possibly you need to inform MK...? as their data sheet describes the single module RCBO I linked previously as "Double Pole"?
https://mksentrycircuitprotection.c...s/2024/12/Mini-RCBOs_Circpro_Technical_v7.pdf
e.g. Features • Single module • Meet BS EN and IEE Wiring Regulation requirements • Allows both overcurrent and earth fault protection and detection • Available in a range of current ratings • Tunnel type terminals • Generous terminal capacity • Positive contact status indication • Double Pole • Bi-directional
nicebutdim
Active member
I don't believe they described them in that way before MK circuit protection was discontinued by Honeywell and licensed to another company. Maybe they're right and maybe they aren't, but I'd be surprised if they've managed to produce a true double pole RCBO into one module, without fanfare, when no other manufacturer has managed to do so.
Other manufacturers have, in the past, used 'double pole' to describe SP+N RCBOs, but subsequently corrected that term. I haven't looked to see what they IET say on this matter, but strongly suspect the SP+N moniker didn't come about without good reason.
mainline
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2022
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 73
Double pole disconnects both the live and neutral wires for full isolation.
Sp+N Is not considered to be a true double pole device, as it doesn't control two separate circuits simultaneously.
nicebutdim
Active member
I'd raised the issue of wording previously and had since forgotten to check. You're correct in stating the above and SP+N RCBOs meet regulatory requirements.
Please clarify:
What event is an example where a 'double pole' device and a 'SP+N' device would act differently?
mainline
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2022
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 73
Reverse polarity could be one.
The lack of overcurrent protection on the N.
The N contacts are more like a simple switch, rather than having the same breaking capacity as the L side.
As already said, in most scenarios it won't make much difference.
Is some of this the result of manufacturers going from two module width to one module width, and choosing to down-grade the spec as a result?
And in the other dimension, were consumer units that could only fit 45mm high devices the most popular, and could not handle 72mm ones?
And in the other dimension, were consumer units that could only fit 45mm high devices the most popular, and could not handle 72mm ones?
nicebutdim
Active member
I've always assumed the drive toward compact form is mostly due to the space restraints often encountered in domestic properties. Even since the advent of electricity, builders don't seem inclined to provide an inch more than necessary for its distribution. Even larger, modern properties have plant rooms primarily designed for other services and we're generally just lucky enough to have a bit of unused wall space to work with.
Fairly certain at least a few continental European countries require the sort of double pole protection that gives rise to our SP+N distinction, which is why they're well use to two module wide devices in boards considerably larger than the UK allows for.
Edit: I do like the more compact form we use in domestic properties, but it would be nice having twice the space to work with. I spend my days working in spacious boards, then evenings in the tighter confines of under stairs or a downstairs toilet asking myself it the money is worth it.
Fairly certain at least a few continental European countries require the sort of double pole protection that gives rise to our SP+N distinction, which is why they're well use to two module wide devices in boards considerably larger than the UK allows for.
Edit: I do like the more compact form we use in domestic properties, but it would be nice having twice the space to work with. I spend my days working in spacious boards, then evenings in the tighter confines of under stairs or a downstairs toilet asking myself it the money is worth it.
Similar threads
