I was always shown by my employer that a seperate core was to be used for the cpc , dont rely on the armour .Why 5 Core SWA, what benifit does it serve, did the calculation require additional cpc.
I was always shown by my employer that a seperate core was to be used for the cpc , dont rely on the armour .Why 5 Core SWA, what benifit does it serve, did the calculation require additional cpc.
Providing it meets the correct size requirement and is terminated correctly It should not be an issue to be honest.I was always shown by my employer that a seperate core was to be used for the cpc , dont rely on the armour .
Seen on occassion when the swa connected to non - metallic enclosure and armour not connected to MET , having that physical cpc core then at least gives some protection.As far as SWA as a CPC goes, there is nothing wrong with it, however, the job has to be done right, regardless ow whether you use the armour as a CPC or not.
IF you use the armour as the CPC it must comply with the requirements.
IF you don't use the armour as the CPC, then it still has to comply with the requirements of being used as a CPC, so why add another?
Sorry not saying you are , just saying that i have seen situations when then armour is not connected due to non - metallic enclosures and cpc has been used as sole protection , the point being that at least circuit downstream still has that connection even when armour not connected.Hang on,,,, I'm definitely not advocating that a CPC core can be used instead of the armour, that will still need to be connected (at the supply end at least)
Just because you've seen installations by idiots that are incompetent is not really a reason to add a lot of un-necessary expense onto a job.Seen on occassion when the swa connected to non - metallic enclosure and armour not connected to MET , having that physical cpc core then at least gives some protection.
Im with Noz on this , better to have too much than not enough .
Enter your email address to join: