Chint rcd BS number

[D Brennan]

Does anyone no the bs number for a chint rcd, i cannot find it anywere.

cheers

 

[green-hornet]

Yes its the same for all RCDs, like its the same for all MCB's

The BS numbers relate to the actual standards for such things like rcd, mcb and other switching stuff.

So for a chint rcd the BS number would be 61009

 

[Andy™]

Yes its the same for all RCDs, like its the same for all MCB'sThe BS numbers relate to the actual standards for such things like rcd, mcb and other switching stuff.

So for a chint rcd the BS number would be 61009

not quite GH. 61009 is for RCBO's. 61008 is RCD's

 

[Evans Electric]

Dav, is there no BS number on the device ? Just wondering if it actually has one .

Deke

 

[D Brennan]

Dav, is there no BS number on the device ? Just wondering if it actually has one .Deke

no none, i was wondering the same. i phoned the manufac today but they never phoned back

 

[Evans Electric]

That could be interesting then , perhaps I can find them online.

Deke

 

[green-hornet]

not quite GH. 61009 is for RCBO's. 61008 is RCD's

DAM now got to change 20 years of certs:O

No not really, thanks andy my mistake long day today PIR, on a factory with no labels, no circuit diagrams, 1970's obsolete switch gear old type 3 BS 3871 breakers, BILL old style rewireables all over the place with what looks like 4mm single copper cable to rewire a 100amp fuse on a 3 phase board.

Then I had a 25mm nuetral to a DB and only 1 4mm netral fed off it to supply about 8 machines.

Now I do have an headache

 

[Andy™]

sounds like a fun job there GH!

 

[Andy™]

That could be interesting then , perhaps I can find them online.Deke

thats if our resident search engine doesnt find them first

 

[Apache]

thats if our resident search engine doesnt find them first

They don't actually seem to have one - only a European number

EN61008-1

 

[Andy™]

They don't actually seem to have one - only a European numberEN61008-1

that would be the number were looking for...

 

[Apache]

that would be the number were looking for...

That's good then

 

[Andy™]

That's good then

but is also in post 3....