Anyone have to hand , the comparative SWA sizes to copper cable . I have them but cannot find them . ( And I'm getting really fed up )
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone have to hand , the comparative SWA sizes to copper cable . I have them but cannot find them . ( And I'm getting really fed up )
Blew ourselves up this morning by NOT double checking with the testers :C During EICR , open up a TPN welding socket , measure Zs , switch off MCB ...(we know its the right one , can see the cable) ..... I shout "Its off" ..my mate shouts " Brown to Earth" for R1 R2 ..I stick the prods in at the board , the warning light comes on the meter .....before I can shout again my mate shorts out Brown to Earth and BANG !!!
Because the EICR book asks for it . I always considered it was a waste of time but I don't print the books :CI'll have to ask. Why are you conducting an (R1+R2) test having already verified cpc continuity through a live Zs test in an already energised installation?
I'll look forward to that . ...........not.Surge protection device
Next year you’ll have an AFDD - A F***King Dumb Device I think Tony described it as?
What do you mean Deke?Sidey I give up ... can't see any reference to Guidance notes . I'd appreciate the "official version" although I've used the above for the sake of the report.
I assumed Guidance Note 8 would be in the Regs Sidey . I 've always used the one that Sharpend posted but now don' t seem to have .Do you want the tables from Guidance note 8?
Does a zs verify the circuit earth or merely an earth path of some descript.!
Because the EICR book asks for it . I always considered it was a waste of time but I don't print the books :C
Rest assured I'm the last person to be ticking boxes for the sake of it....I'm as fond of paperwork as Stepps is :innocentIt just needs remembered that filling out boxes for the sake of it achieves precisely nothing.
It is accepted as a means of verifying it on an already energised system. Dead testing is essential for initial verification as you need to verify it is safe to connect to the supply. For an EICR the supply is already connected. GN3 states that it is an acceptable method therefore to verify cpc continuity on an energised installation.
Just because it’s permitted doesn’t mean it’s correct?
It doesn't. The Schedule of Test Results is common to all reports and certificates (MEIWC excepted). Nowhere does it state that every test must be done for an EICR - it just needs to be agreed with the client what you are doing and what you are not doing.
It just needs remembered that filling out boxes for the sake of it achieves precisely nothing.
but it’s what they want so that’s what we do! Doesn’t make it right?
Enter your email address to join: