That, in the Long & Glorious history of this forum;
There is one "special" distinction available, which no-one has EVER done before.
Until tonight.
I refer to "scoobs". Many of you know what "scoobs" are, and many of you have been given them.
BUT, until today, No-one has EVER had a number of scoobs that is LESS than NONE!
So, they don`t have "scoobs". They must have something elses, that are opposite (ish) to a "scoob".
I`m voting we call them "boobs". No offence to the female members of the forum is intended, and if any of you object, then we`ll have something else.
Your thoughts, guys & gals.....
There is one "special" distinction available, which no-one has EVER done before.
Until tonight.
I refer to "scoobs". Many of you know what "scoobs" are, and many of you have been given them.
BUT, until today, No-one has EVER had a number of scoobs that is LESS than NONE!
So, they don`t have "scoobs". They must have something elses, that are opposite (ish) to a "scoob".
I`m voting we call them "boobs". No offence to the female members of the forum is intended, and if any of you object, then we`ll have something else.
Your thoughts, guys & gals.....