Heard a comment on radio that the recent royal wedding attracted 13,000,000 viewers on BBC and a couple on ITV :innocent . But how do they know how many tuned in ?
HHMMMM ! I could see how you could detect a device that was transmitting but is it so easy to detect a receiver I ask ?
It would be easier on commercial telly as everyone would put a brew on during the breaks and courgette up national grid.
:lol:
Well,I am not one of the 13m
not seen ANY of the Ginger/bit part actress of dubious past wedding OR any of the 22 nonces kicking an inflated pigs bladder around a piece of grass as though it mattered
HHMMMM ! I could see how you could detect a device that was transmitting but is it so easy to detect a receiver I ask ?
Can't be that method Ducky theres no Commer vans on the roads now .
I have to say how those outside broadcasts are really suited to to the latest HD TVs etc . Whether its royal marriages or 22 pigs kicking a nonce's bladder around a field ... the pictures are a definite improvement on B&W 405 line 1950's tellyWell,I am not one of the 13m
not seen ANY of the Ginger/bit part actress of dubious past wedding OR any of the 22 nonces kicking an inflated pigs bladder around a piece of grass as though it mattered
Indeed. We had one in the house when I was a boy. My parents got a very small payment for having it, and (technology of the day) a man came every week to change the waxed paper roll that recorded it's information. I worked out it printed code on the roll every time you turned the set on, off or changed between the 3 available channels. It was hard wired into the back of the tv. If I got particularly bored on occasions I would sit there just pressing the buttons for fun to hear it whir away inside.A number of homes in the uk have devices that log which channels are viewed etc ...... this is taken as a representative sample ....... and hence the claimed millions of viewers.
Don’t some of the new smart TVs actually spy on you?
Oh a conspiracy theory ....I love 'em .Ain't jus the telly's that are spying on us.
:innocent
You'll never swing that statistic on your own Roys but I support your efforts .I do it to try and sway the figures to show that soaps are not watched, but documentaries are far more popular.
Honestly I have pondered it myself, the tv licence Sprouts just work off the assumption that everyone has a telly.
Yep, you want to see the threatening letters i get..
Well, i have not even got a telly, so they can courgette off when they come..
I know, you are all wondering why i do not just tell them i have not got one. Well, they send you a threatening letter telling you that if you DO NOT have a telly to tell them, but then add that they might well turn up anyway..
Well, if that is their attitude, they can courgette right off and waste their time coming here. I will not even let them in, nothing they can do.
IF, they had written civil letters, i would have been perfectly cooperative with them, but since they started with their attitude [the first letter you get is a disgrace] they can go courgette themselves..
john..
Post them up here :lol:
In the days of that old Commer I believe they could detect the local oscillator radiations emitted by the receiver, in which case they could tell exactly what was being watched with a precise location too. In these days of digital/cable/satellite I haven't a clue .HHMMMM ! I could see how you could detect a device that was transmitting but is it so easy to detect a receiver I ask ?
Can't be that method Ducky theres no Commer vans on the roads now .
Enter your email address to join: