@binky: Very sensible and valid points. Like I say I have no issue with the concept of conducting regular assesments. Personally I think it should apply to every household not just rented accommodation. The argument that home owners look after their property better is mute. They don't, they sit on it and wait until they can't wait any longer. What's more, they're more likely to go the DIY route. Tenants are forbidden from making alterations and very quickly speak up if there is a problem (that's not to say tenat always obey the terms of the tenancy agreement - that's another issue).
All that aside there needs to be some perspective:
http://www.electricalsafetyfirst.org.uk/what-we-do/policies-and-research/statistics/
For 2011/12:
Deaths as the result of electrical installations: 8
Injuries as the result of electrical installations: 167
Fires as the result of electrical installations: 2,471
Remember this is in a country with a population of nearly 70 Million.
None decent homes: 2012/2013 (not sure how they measure this):
Private Rented: 33.1%
Owner Occupied: 20.3%
Local Authority + Housing Association: 30.6%
What's more as and engineer I know that after enough years the world starts to look very different. I see a bolt and start thinking torque ratings, compression, extension, corrosion. Everyone else on the other hand goes the TAF (Tight As F***) approach and to be honest - it's generally fine. I see a cable and I think load rating, insulation characteristics, where is it installed... you get the picture.
@Sidewinder: Thanks for the link. It affirms what I already know (especially as Bristol County Council forced me to do a landlord certification - again not a requirement for other landlords outside my postcode).
Here's the reality. Not all Landlords are penny pinching slum lords. Most private landlords I know are landlords out of circumstance or they were buying a new home and wanted to keep the previous home as an investment vehicle (let's face it your getting nothing from the bank in terms of interest on savings, and you future state pension is worthless).
In my case I had to relocate for personal reasons and due to the down turn in the property market selling was not an option. Nor was leaving the property empty as Bristol Count Council penalise owners of empty properties (they're charged full council tax to deter the owners from keeping them empty). On top of that an empty property in Bristol will very quickly be taken over by squatters or canabis growers.
It just so happens that a freind, single working parent, had been made homeless. I agreed to let her rent at a reduced rate, because it was mutually benificial. It saved me from having the problems of an empty property and it meant she could move into a 3 bed semi, in a good area which she probably would not otherwise afford.
Isn't the big thing about better landlords, better quality homing and all at a more affordabile rate? At least that is the line spun by they goverment whilst at the same time they're grinding down on private landlords and driving them out of the market in favour of bigger corporations/businesses.
60% of the income from the property is going to the goverment in some form. 30% goes back to the bank and the final 10% goes to meet legal obligations (insurance, certifications, etc) I also provide full breakdown cover for my tenant she only has to call a number. After all this the £40 a month that was left over was set aside for maintenance tasks.
I'm not making excuses here! I'm simply pointing out that the reality of the situation for a large number of landlords in that there is only so much they can do. As it stands with the addition of SLL I'm now effectively paying for the tenant to live in the property. Even if I increase her rent the amount of additional revenue generated bairly makes it sustainable. The end result, she's going to end up out of what in reality is a perfectly good home.
If the government and everyone else really want better landlords and better homes then they need to stop penalising the good landlords and start making it worth their while - give us a break, gsh!
As for Electricians. Like every profession, you get the good and the bad. Unfortunately there are probably more bad than good in that most see and EICR as an opportunity to make money (one guy I called actually said "You're ok, landlords have loads of money", he didn't get the job).
To lighten the tone abit, my wife once took her car in for MOT with a well known garage. They told her it had failed and needed expensive brake repairs, "Oh dear, your brake pipes are rusty, the brake pads are warn and the brake discs need changing". She came home all distressed and told me. I had to called the garage and pointed out, "The brake pipes are enameled copper and unlikely to be rusty. I had recently serviced the vehicle which included changing the brake pads and the discs are not excessively warn".