Not 100% true 522.6.7 refersif you add to an existing, what you add has to be to new regs. so if you add a new socket its gotta be RCD'd. either by RCD spur, RCD at DB, or RCD socket if cable doesnt need it
411.3.3Not 100% true 522.6.7 refersInstructed person
A person adequately advised or supervised by skilled persons to enable him/her to avoid dangers which electricity may create
so if the customer is not totally brain dead and is instructed.....
"keep away from that cable route with your hammer and nails"
no rcd required ?
BS7671 is not set in stone on what you can and cannot do
But this work is in a notifiable area, and probably consistes of a bit more than a small mod. Whilst not retrospective there is still an element of bringing upto date, especiall in tennant properties which I suspect these are. Hence also we usually update protective bonding whilst undertaking such works.Forgive me if ive missed something, but the new regs are not retrospective, so if you are adding to existing circuits you cant force client to have rcd protection added to the circuit.Maybee just add disclaimer to cert.
Well today was interesting, to cut a long story short RCD Protection will be fitted. I will be using the idea spec posted last night with a 40amp 30mA RCD fitted outside board to cover sockets. And so much for the money problem, i'm getting
Your almost right, but not quite. For example, You could fit 4 double sockets and need no Rcd protection if they were labelled something like this,bog standard domestic socket needs additional RCD protection.
Not a problem now mate they have seen sense RCD Protection will be fitted, they have 'found' extra money to add to their budget.As this is notifiable work why don't you land it on the nic/napit/elecsa or whoever and ask them for advice so you can give it to your client in writing if possible? If they won't see sense then go back to the nic etc and wait for the s**t to hit the fan.or......walk away........or...........do it illegally.
Sometimes you have to stand your ground even if you are worried after all the person following you will certainly drop you in it.
Correct but.... I think as Andy C said..Forgive me if ive missed something, but the new regs are not retrospective, so if you are adding to existing circuits you cant force client to have rcd protection added to the circuit.Maybee just add disclaimer to cert.
Applaud Smiley:x:^OYour almost right, but not quite. For example, You could fit 4 double sockets and need no Rcd protection if they were labelled something like this,Dedicated sockets. use only correct appliances.
Toaster only.
Kettle only.
Food mixer only.
Blender only.
Microwave only.
Juicer only.
Fridge only.
Bacon slicer only.
; \ ; \
Beer's on you then tonight Mcgaw!?Applaud SmileyYeah for whole kitchen, ; )Its turning out to be a worthwhile contract, i've even had to employ someone.
You are correct..No time for beer mate, just another quick question then off to bed start at 5am tomorrow. Is there anything that states that kitchen sockets must be on a seperate circuit from the other sockets? I said they didn't as it goes by area covered ie 100m2. Am i correct???
No. as long as new cable not buried in the wall!if i add a spur from a ring circuit for a washing m/c using plastic trunking and mark that skt w/machine do i need a rcd on the ring
Just to addNo time for beer mate, just another quick question then off to bed start at 5am tomorrow. Is there anything that states that kitchen sockets must be on a seperate circuit from the other sockets? I said they didn't as it goes by area covered ie 100m2. Am i correct???
right ****** when the hose springs a leak and you need to pull it out of the way quickly!No. as long as new cable not buried in the wall!you could even put the w/machine into fused spur so no socket..
so no need to label?
Agreed,right ****** when the hose springs a leak and you need to pull it out of the way quickly!Of if needs repair?
IMO
Enter your email address to join: