I'll start at page1
position- owner,
surely something like proprietor would sound more professional.?
page
2
have you actually seen the overcurrent protective device? or do you have it in writing as to what it is? you have stated on a legal document that you know what it is as a fact.
good point, the suppliers protective device was not checked because there was an isolation switch, would it be a good idea to note it as not verified in box 7 page 1 comments on existing installation
U = does not equal 240v, never has.
that was inserted automaticaly by the sofware shall see if can be altered
double or reinforced insulation = N/A are you sure? at the very least what about the tails? or any pendants you may have (class II fittings remember)
Again good point and duley noted
fire barriers etc = N/A again this wouldnt be an N/A , imm htr with HR flex for example, at the least you would have to make it a limitation
noted
page
3
why is the shower 5s disconnection?
thats my fault, this was an install which i observed and noted test results for cert filling practice, i originally thought the shower circuit was in 10mm t&e on a 40 A MCB, i since learned that it was actualy 6mm on a 32A MCB i just forgot to amend that column when i edited
just a few things to ponder,
not meant in a bad way, just food for thought.
HTH