scoobed, I can see how it might affect continuity, but unless you use something like PTFE tape, a locknut on the thread surely won't affect water tightness, there is the same amount of gap between the threads, it is just shifted over so that the thread faces are in contact. And PTFE might affect continuity.it would be loose which would affect continuity and possible water ingress
Rob , you can't start making up your own regs . :B ........a runner is as you so accurately described but ALWAYS with a lockring backing it up .scoobed, I can see how it might affect continuity, but unless you use something like PTFE tape, a locknut on the thread surely won't affect water tightness, there is the same amount of gap between the threads, it is just shifted over so that the thread faces are in contact. And PTFE might affect continuity.
By the way , all runners had to be painted ...you had a choice of silver galvo paint or red oxide.
I can see how it might affect continuity, but unless you use something like PTFE tape, a locknut on the thread surely won't affect water tightness, there is the same amount of gap between the threads, it is just shifted over so that the thread faces are in contact. And PTFE might affect continuity.
How do they get away with calling the new stuff 'black enamelled,'?
enamelling must have a new definition now!...its usually down to bare metal as soon as you take it off the roof rack, put it in a pipe vice and it looks like you have had a knurling tool on it
How do they get away with calling the new stuff 'black enamelled,'?
enamelling must have a new definition now!...its usually down to bare metal as soon as you take it off the roof rack, put it in a pipe vice and it looks like you have had a knurling tool on it
boughtbsome from CEF many years ago, it was from their 'pre rusted range'! All boxes had to be retapped and all threads re done....total,carp
on a slight tangent, since Pyro was mentioned. CEF MICC glands were not Ex rated a few years ago...not sure about now though.
The firm that did a local filling station did not realise this...until i did an inspection a few years later
Since when,?I personally think @dmxrr is doing the right thing. Pyro is a thing of the past except for a listed building so that leaves steel conduit. This is the correct choice. SWA? Come on? And since when was doing a running coupler an issue?
Doing a large Data install,a couple of months ago. Fire Alarm muppet arrives and told manager that system needed extending as it did not comply ( strange as it never came up,during any of their annual tests). And all the pyro,would have to be ripped out as it was illegal to join 'soft skin' to MICC!Only those who don’t know how to work with Pyro decry it.
Since when,?
Properly installed pyro will outlast us all, and the next generation too,!!
Only those who don’t know how to work with Pyro decry it.
Agreed. I do like a good bit of tray and trunking work also though.It has to be said though, properly installed pyro is a work of art, it is also a fairly discreet cable so lends itself to being able to blend into the background.
I have very limited knowledge on pyro. Installed probably about 20 meters and made of 4 ends. That is that. However; it is a fact that it is hardly used these days compared to alternative methods. I know electricians like to flex their muscles with things like this but I prefer to just say it as I see it.
The reason it is rarely used now is expense and lack of ^knowledge^.
If we consider the job in question, bending conduit to the form of the walls will take time. Total the cost of that time and materials and compare it to the cost of Pyro with its speedier installation.
If a job specification stated MI cable throughout would you:
A/ Turn the job down.
B/ Learn how to work Pyro.
C/ Subcontract the job.
Enter your email address to join: