Is the answer 1.44 x 0.8 = 1.152?Hi Damien.No not exactly, the value you obtain from continuity testing is either R2 or
R1 +R2.
If you add the R1 + R2 to the Ze Reading then you have Zs
Tables in the Regs Give MAXIMUM Zs Values for different types of Protective Devices that enable them to Automatically Disconnect the Supply (ADS) within the TIME required for that circuit.
For example You have a Radial Circuit to a Cooker wired in T&E and run in Mini Trunking.
This does NOT require RCD protection as it has No 13A socket just a Cooker switch, and the wiring is NOT embedded in the wall.
NO RCD is requiered so ADS can be provided by a 32A Type B MCB to BS 60898
You have obtained an R1 +R2 Reading of 1.00 ohms for this circuit (Its a long one) wired in 6mm T&E Cable.
Will it comply? Well if the Ze value for this installation is 0.35 ohms see if you can find out.
BRB Pg 49 Table 41.3 gives You the Maximum Zs value, however just to complicate matters we have to Multiply this by 0.8, to see if our TEST value is ok.
Let us know what you have worked out ( NO HELP PLEASE)
1 Ohm, 32A MCB as suggested by sparkytim.Damienwhat are your readings for your R1,,Rn ?
and i assume you are on a 32amp mcb type b ?
Unacceptable. Well done. So how could we make it acceptable?Is the answer 1.44 x 0.8 = 1.152?If so the Zs of 1.35 is less than the BRB figure of 1.44 but more than the 1.152 figure (80%) so does this make it unacceptable?
Hi Theroy1 Ohm, 32A MCB as suggested by sparkytim.
DohHi TheroyJust a hypothetical example given
Thanks
Tim
I think we all suffer from that from time to time.Dohsorry mate i should read the posts properly !!!!! :coat
Use a bigger cable? Or find a shorter route from the MCB to the cooker switch?Unacceptable. Well done. So how could we make it acceptable?
In addition to Sparkytims info..Hi guys,I've just been looking into what the maximum allowed value is when testing for continuity of CPC but I can't seem to find one - Is there one?
Where are you getting the figures in red from?In addition to Sparkytims info..The other consideration you could make if you have just done a wander lead method to get an R2 value on its own...
Is a quick calc using the values from Table 9A pg 166 OSG to see if the Calculated cable length is approx to your calculated length...
e.g.
Say you have run a 2.5mm radial for an immersion heater..
by looking at the physical installation you know the circuit is approx 20m - 25m fusebox to Immersion heater cupboard.
2.5mm T&E has 1.5mm CPC
1.5mm conductor is 12.10mohm per meter
so your MAX R2 value should be approx 0.24ohms to 0.30ohms.
If you were getting readings significantly higher then this it would imply something wrong..
either with you reading method... or bad joint... or damaged cable..
(12.10/1000) * 20 = 0.24Where are you getting the figures in red from?
The value should be 19.51, not 12.10 i.e. 2.5mm line conductor with a 1.5mm CPC(12.10/1000) * 20 = 0.24(12.10/1000) * 25 = 0.30
This is the measurement for the cpc onlyThe value should be 19.51, not 12.10 i.e. 2.5mm line conductor with a 1.5mm CPC
Page 166 table 9A On Site Guide...(12.10/1000) * 20 = 0.24(12.10/1000) * 25 = 0.30
This is the measurement for the cpc onlyTable 9A OSG
1.5 = 12.10
Your original question was for Max. R2 value. 19.51 would be for R1 + R2
If you test continuity of CPC by testing R1 + R2 would you use the value in the 8th line down (19.51)?Page 166 table 9A On Site Guide...third line down....
a 1.5mm conductor on its own .. 12.10 milliohms per metre.
NOT a line & CPC value
e.g.
you can see on the 6th line down a 2.5mm conductor is 7.41 milliohms
and therefore a 2.5/1.5 T&E is 12.10+7.41= 19.51
(which is as written in the 8th line down!)
the 20 & 25 are just my assumed example cable lengths...
:coffee
CorrectIf you test continuity of CPC by testing R1 + R2 would you use the value in the 8th line down (19.51)?
Enter your email address to join: