Doc Hudson
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2008
- Messages
- 5,619
- Reaction score
- 230
Hello again Unphased, just so I am not getting the wrong and of the stick I will just clarify that I am assuming your concerns stem from the Metalclad on a TT thread. Whatever you or any member reads on the open forum may or may not reflect upon what "Reported Post" messages are sent to the moderators. I will not comment on specifics but as far as I know only moderators and Admin get messages received when any member reports a post. All members are free to report any posts they are concerned about using the report post feature. It is generally from "reported posts" that any moderator or admin will make a response.Okay, I take the point about PMs. It would seem that open forum "slapped wrist" approach works. In my case though, I had ONE complaint made against me from a forum member and within seconds three mods and an admin berating me. That was unnecessary. Only one modrator or one admin needs to deal with it. PLEASE. You don't need a wholescale attack on a member to bring someone in to line. This smacks of bullying.An excellent example of my gripe. Here we have a maderator who is hinting that he would have given me a 7 day ban. On top of the three mods and an admin who had their say. So which one of the mods and admin do I answer to? This is a very bad way to run a forum. When any mod is seen to interject then other mods back off. There really is no need for several moderators to deal with any member behaving badly. This I feel very strongly about and should be discussed by all the mods and admin. ONE mod or ONE admin takes ona case. That was wrong what happened to me.
Just exactly how many modrators do we have on the forum? And how many administrators? Do we have too many?
No members answer to any of the mods or Admin. Every member answers to the forum as a whole. All members, moderators included are entitled to reply to any post they consider appropriate. If you read the wider forum a majority of the moderators posts are part of the constructive debate or assisting newer members with guidance about using the forum.
To try and establish a rule where only one moderator can deal with any particular problem, whilst sensible in theory, in reality it may be difficult to administer. As I have previously mentioned no Admins or Moderators are on any timed shift pattern to oversee the forum, sometimes there may be none logged on, other times there may be several. If one moderator happens to be on line when a situation occurs and starts replying to the problem, but then is busy with other work and unable to give the forum much of their voluntary spare time, then other moderators have to be able to contribute as and when they feel it appropriate.
On the whole moderators try to ensure all members are treated with respect. That general guidance and discussion does answer the various questions asked. That information given is factually correct and not just an abundance of here-say gossip with no reference to the industry guidance. Also that simple spoon feeding answers to very basic questions achieves very little toward anyones increased understanding of the industry. So two way discussion and questioning is a perfectly normal part of a successful forum. All members are entitled to post their opinions on a subject and all members are entitled to comment on those opinions, including Admin and Moderators. But name calling and abuse are not and will not be tolerated. I apologies if we get it wrong on occasions, it is a thankless task and we do our best. I am inclined to think if the forum is run in a very bad way, most members would not be here posting?
I am of the opinion that the number of moderators and/or Admins on any forum is at the sole discretion of those who set the forum up, and pay to keep it running. Not the choice of any member(s) who are just using the free service for their own personal benefit. Admin has added and removed moderators as and when appropriate in the past, I am happy to leave that aspect of the forum to Admins choice. If everyone is complying with the forums T&C's and posting in a respectful manner the number of moderators is irrelevant. Possible having too few could make things complicated when holiday periods, sickness or work commitments restrict the personal time that any moderator can give to the forum.
Doc H.