I have the test results sheets as performed by Haste - the DNO asked for them to be done, and paid for them, so they must give them credibility. If they want to wash their hands of the issue, they would have tried, with "proper" tests, to find fault at my end. headbangyou dont have evidence,you have coincidence.
you MUST have proof your install is NOT to blame,
first and foremost that is what any defence will ask for, without that your case has nothing to stand on.
the test you have had done will not stand up to any sort of scrutiny, that has been shown on this forum already.
FWIW, I'm certain they KNOW they have a problem, and are hoping the replaced trip will mask it, not cure it.
---------- Post Auto-Merged at 02:46 ---------- Previous post was made at 02:44 ----------
Continual "coincidence" in my book is evidence, especially when no other non-attributable trips occur.
Turn the tables : why would they have paid for tests that you and others are saying prove nothing........
Last edited by a moderator: