You raise a fair point there , O ultimate one - no, I haven`t been with another provider - I chose NIC at the inception of the business.
It may be a form of self-regulation; but I like to let my area engineer choose the sites - I don`t do anything different on any of the jobs, and if I AM doing something that doesn`t comply, I want to know about it.
I accept that is more difficult where most / all of your work is domestic, but it is still possible. If customers are aware that an inspector may come to their premises to ensure your work was up to scratch, would any of them have an issue with it? Mine never have - on the contrary, they feel happier still, knowing that your work on their property has been assessed.
This idea of showing your own house, and either your neighbour / mate / family member`s job is riddled with problems - as is the whole competant person system.
IMO, the issue stems from the origins of the "part P" qualification. NOT the qualification itself, or the original intention (to allow other trades to be able to carry out small electrical works, which were an integral part of their work, safely) ; i.e. the plumber who needs to connect up CH systems.
However, when it was (sorry if I offend anyone) abused by people using that system as a "fast-track" to becoming "AN ELECTRICIAN"!, is when the issues begun. I am not decrying the professionalism of anyone, or any particular scheme provider. I am simply saying that, in MY opinion, therein lies the root cause of much of our profession`s woes.
Yes, there are bad electricians. Always have been, always will be. Same can be said for all and any other trade.
*** n.b. As Steptoe would say: "It`s only my opinion" ***
KME
It may be a form of self-regulation; but I like to let my area engineer choose the sites - I don`t do anything different on any of the jobs, and if I AM doing something that doesn`t comply, I want to know about it.
I accept that is more difficult where most / all of your work is domestic, but it is still possible. If customers are aware that an inspector may come to their premises to ensure your work was up to scratch, would any of them have an issue with it? Mine never have - on the contrary, they feel happier still, knowing that your work on their property has been assessed.
This idea of showing your own house, and either your neighbour / mate / family member`s job is riddled with problems - as is the whole competant person system.
IMO, the issue stems from the origins of the "part P" qualification. NOT the qualification itself, or the original intention (to allow other trades to be able to carry out small electrical works, which were an integral part of their work, safely) ; i.e. the plumber who needs to connect up CH systems.
However, when it was (sorry if I offend anyone) abused by people using that system as a "fast-track" to becoming "AN ELECTRICIAN"!, is when the issues begun. I am not decrying the professionalism of anyone, or any particular scheme provider. I am simply saying that, in MY opinion, therein lies the root cause of much of our profession`s woes.
Yes, there are bad electricians. Always have been, always will be. Same can be said for all and any other trade.
*** n.b. As Steptoe would say: "It`s only my opinion" ***
KME