Wow - been away for a couple of days and find 6 pages of posts to my original threads - thanks everyone - very interesting reading!I take particular relief from the fact that a lot of replies come from "time-served" electricians who are members of this forum - its good to see that its not over-frequented with keen amateurs!
You could say that I served a very long apprenticeship - some 30 years of various work - before taking the electrical training when I left my last job. A lot of the skills I had acquired were building work related, what I lacked was the up to date knowledge for the electrical installation work. I could not get an apprenticeship for love nor money (too old) anyway so after some six months intensive study, and various courses I set up on my own. I only do jobs within my capability (I understand 3-phase theory but dont have experience of it so dont accept 3-phase work, or anything else outside my scope e.g. alarms, PV, emergency lighting etc.) and have since gradually built up a good customer base.
What concerns me is when I hear electricans discourse on part P installers being dangerous, yet I constantly deal with premises where work is allegedly done by "a professional electrician" but clearly isn't. For example - 30A fuse for 2.5 T&E radial, 7 sockets off a ring (unfused) spur in a kitchen (OK that was probably a kitchen fitter?), customers who have had work done with no certificates, untested work (an IR fault on a ring main where customer drilled through cable - "last electrician said it was OK"), an outside light wired with live from hall light switch and "borrowed neutral" from CU, extensions wired from existing ring - overloading circuit... the list seems endless sometimes.
The difficulty is in identifying what is work by a competent electrician, and what is not. I suspect some of my local competitors do not always issue certificates because local electrical wholesalers report a "fear of Part P." This therefore makes it difficult to know what has been done by competent electricians and what has not. So if I have difiiculty identifying legitimate work (and our customers often lie about the history of their electrics) is that not the case with the AC's? Are DI's getting blamed for shoddy work when it was either a customer or cowboy at fault?
So I have to agree with those posts who say the Part P system is "pants" and not working. Maybe its time to stop ****ging off everyone who does not have at leats a 2.1 degree in Master Electrics, and served a 10-year apprenticeship as not being a competent electrician, and start setting up a properly regulated process for household electrical installations.