Yes I know - but it has been established that this is a commercial project, therefore part P does not apply -the point is that a re-furb - unless a public building can be reinstated to original condition as regards positioning.You may want to read the thread properly as it states it not a dwelling.
This is a commercial install and would have to provide access to disabled unless special reasons are allowed, for instance historic building , in which case portable access would need to be supplied. As far as the electrical installation is concerned it should be to all standards, unless exceptions have been given. Access to public buildings, is very defined, and anyone who proceeds with any alterations without due consideration to the requirements can fall very foul with the laws.Yes I know - but it has been established that this is a commercial project, therefore part P does not apply -the point is that a re-furb - unless a public building can be reinstated to original condition as regards positioning.Not an esay on the project!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Clearly (a) does not apply and (B) is not likely to either so Part M has to be followed.(a) an extension of or material alteration of a dwelling; or(B) any part of a building which is used solely to enable the building or any service or fitting in the building to be inspected, repaired or maintained.
You need to rethink that then as that may apply to dwellings but not other buildings. Suggest you read Approved Document M.The way i see this is that as long as your work is making the property no less compliant with the regs than it already is then you can have the sockets at the same height. But it sounds like there is extensive work going on so i shouldnt think it would be much hardship for the heights of the sockets/switches to change? I am only getting this info from part p, which obviously doesnt apply in this situation! Does part M make reference to changes/ alterations to existing installations?