......but I can totally understand the position of someone having a tough time through no fault of thier own. Having laid out money on materials, then worked for two weeks, is it ethically reasonable to expect a contractor to wait another week for no reson other than the customers convenience? This simple economical common sense, not bad business practice....
Maselec I would just make it quite clear I am not quibbling or lecturing anyone...
I make no assumptions about your or anyone else's business accumen....
But....
This forum has LOADS of members who just read and don't post....
some opinions have been posted on this topic of which I personally hold a different view..
(and some others have similar views to both side..)
For the benefit of the silent members who may be just starting on thier own..
or considering starting up on thier own...
discussing topics such as these can be a valuable resource of knowledge and experience of two opposing views...
Anyway I would still consider that
your "Customers convenience" could be considered as "Traders poor contract payments terms"?
The point missing is still what contract agreements you as the trader arrange BEFORE you commence work...
If any trader is aware they have tight budgets..
Then it is the traders responsibility to arrange earlier stage payments to cover their initial material outlay....
Basics of business practice I think... Its not complex to organise?
I would also add that I can think of numerous domestic jobs where either no one is at home or only one partner is home the day the job is completed...
It is perfectly reasonable for a person to check with thier partner that they are both happy with the work completed before finalising payment.
I also know of many couples (often older) who have individual personal accounts..
and it can be the case that one person has to wait for a partner to sign cheques or withdraw cash etc...
waiting till the approaching weekend is in no way an unreasonable request..
Robin Sparks sums it up quite well I think..
p.s.
I would still be interested to know what the actual initial agreed contract (or not) was in this case..
:C :|