Don't think that's a good plan, saying 'fix it or i'm telling' is pretty much blackmail, and he should be fixing it anyway and he should be reported to the NIC anyway. Even if he does get it right (ish) second time round the fact he tried to pass it off as correctly done the first time round is not acceptable.Are you going to tell him that you're a sparky or are you going to play it dumb (with info got of t'internet)????Might be fun to play it dumb, see what he says and then tell him you're a spark and watch his face go white....
then get him to put it right at his expense or you're going to shop him to NICEIC and trading standards
I realise this is the official way of doing it but how many more jobs has he done like this and not been called on? He needs reporting, simple as, even if he does correct it, regardless of what the NIC say. If the NIC aren;t bothered then take it to trading standards. He tried to do a shoddy job and get away with it, there's no non-cowboyishness\imcompetence about it.any complaint must be made in writing to the company before going to the NICEIC, if they then choose to carry out remedials then you cannot go to the NICEIC.... it's the same with anything, you have to give the company chance to sort it out before you go to the next stage
Ask so see a copy of the complains procedure as he will have to be recording them and show them to NIC if needed.Ok, maybe not the right way to go about it...Maybe say you were not happy with what you thought and that you got someone in to have a look...
any complaint must be made in writing to the company before going to the NICEIC, if they then choose to carry out remedials then you cannot go to the NICEIC.... it's the same with anything, you have to give the company chance to sort it out before you go to the next stage
I agree,,, people like this should not be able to trade!! and should be reported.I realise this is the official way of doing it but how many more jobs has he done like this and not been called on? He needs reporting, simple as, even if he does correct it, regardless of what the NIC say. If the NIC aren;t bothered then take it to trading standards. He tried to do a shoddy job and get away with it, there's no non-cowboyishness\imcompetence about it.
Dimplex ax2?The shower is a Dimplex Ax2 7.5kw Electric Shower. Not sure where he got his power from but more than likely taken from the upstairs ring.I have looked on the NIC web site and his name IS on it.
He also has now been in touch with the lady, and said all his work is to the latest reg's and would be backed up by NIC. Also said he would drop the certs round next week and was happy to talk the lady through them.
He said he has put on the cert, he recommends a re-wire and new c/u, which he can price up next week if she wants him to do!!
She asked him if it was OK for her son to be there, which he said yes, so next week I'm going to get a new mum for the day.
Will let you know what happens, if he turns up??
Cheers to you all,
Lyngarth
and they then say a 7.5KW nominal current 31.25 ampsSECTION 6Electrical connection
Warning! This appliance must be earthed
The shower unit must be permanently
connected to the electricity supply, direct from
the consumer unit via a double pole linked
switch with a minimum contact gap of 3mm.
The switch must be readily accessible and
clearly identifiable and out of reach of a person
using a fixed bath or shower tray, unless the
switch is cord operated. The wiring must be
connected to the switch without the use of a
plug or socket outlet.
The cable size required is determined by the kW
rating of the shower and the distance between
the shower and the consumer unit. The table
below will help you choose the correct cable
for your installation, but it will depend upon the
precise circumstances of the installation. If you
are in any doubt consult an electrician.
and of course 701.411.3.3.Good workmanship etc.. etc.. Electrical equipment shall be installed in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufactures of the equipment.
I agree ProDave, those options sound like the correct approach for any professional tradesperson to either accept or decline the original work. It will be interesting to see what further details come to light on this topic?I think the most shocking thing about this job is where has he got his supply from for the shower? I'm very interested to hear the answer to that one.The lack of RCD and poor (non existent due to paint) earth bonding are still valid complaints, but I still think the major non compliance is wherever he got a supply from.
The guy was simply a fool for bodging the job. In a case like this I would have recommended a CU change to do the job properly. If the customer declined that (and that's their prerogative) then I would have installed a mini 2 way CU with RCD just to feed the shower and left the other CU's alone. Still would have done earth bonding properly.
If the customer wouldn't even agree to that, then I would have turned the job down and walked away.
I'm going around first thing tomorrow so will find out just for youoh you sods!!!!!!!!!!!!! X( WHERE IS THE SHOWER FED FROM!!!!
I wanna know????? :_| :_| :_|
good news about the cheque tho! :Applaud:Applaud
:x :xI'm going around first thing tomorrow so will find out just for you
Don't think there should be any problems there going on the photos already in this thread.bear in mind that complaints to the NICEIC are only to do with the standard of work and have nothing to do with any contract