Jonnyboy 68
Junior Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
your comments pls boys
been working with another spark (Dangerous I know !!) and as always we have a couple of differences of opinion...
My understanding is when a 17th Edition CU has been installed, all circuits now RCD protected, as long the main bonding (Gas, Water) is in place and verified, no other bonding is necessary p166 701.415.2 BRB ???
Also, interestingly, would you recommend any existing supplementary bonding be removed or leave it in place ?
Another old chestnut.... the main water supply to the property is in plastic and then copper throughout the property... I've been bonding at the first available bit of copper after the stopcock... I thought i read a thread on here some time ago about the possibility of conductivity of the water within the pipe ??? I reckon ther's still a chance of a potential existing within the property so better to be safe eh ..My mate reckons if plastic incoming then no need to bond...
your views pls boys .. there's beers on this Guinness
been working with another spark (Dangerous I know !!) and as always we have a couple of differences of opinion...
My understanding is when a 17th Edition CU has been installed, all circuits now RCD protected, as long the main bonding (Gas, Water) is in place and verified, no other bonding is necessary p166 701.415.2 BRB ???
Also, interestingly, would you recommend any existing supplementary bonding be removed or leave it in place ?
Another old chestnut.... the main water supply to the property is in plastic and then copper throughout the property... I've been bonding at the first available bit of copper after the stopcock... I thought i read a thread on here some time ago about the possibility of conductivity of the water within the pipe ??? I reckon ther's still a chance of a potential existing within the property so better to be safe eh ..My mate reckons if plastic incoming then no need to bond...
your views pls boys .. there's beers on this Guinness