Right..IMHO this is one where you need to do a bit of risk assessment over costs of remedial improvements -vs- Realistic risk of danger..
First off..
If your distance had of been nearer the house
I probably wouldn't have bothered with TT'ing a wooden shed with no extraneous parts.
But as this is not the case on you job I would be thinking..
1/
How frequently is this shed going to be in use?
e.g General garden jobs -vs- a garden office with persons using it more than 6hrs per day?
unknown to me, maybe lots in one go then not at all for weeks
2/
How hard or easy was it to sink the rods in the ground?
what soil types e.g. sandy, clay'ish, rocky etc..?
quite rocky, but not a problem
3/
Are the existing rods you have put in expandable?
i.e. can you go deeper with a coupler and threaded rod?
14mm x 1200mm Earth Rod ( 5/8" x 4ft )
Yeah I always use the 5/8" ones anyway, problem is after a good hammer with the sledgehammer, it was hard to put the coupler on (any tips for this?)
4/
Do your RCD trip test's operate in good times?
problem at first was I couldn't do the 5x test because it was >333ohms. Now the RCD trips fine and ramp test was 27mA
Dependant upon the above answers..
I may just try to extend existing rod positions down deeper..
(e.g. just rod costs no more earth cable needed)
ALSO
If the shed is rarely used I may be inclined to leave it as is..
BUT arrange to go back a few months down the line to double check the
'Ra' to see if it has deteriorated or improved with time?
(remember 200ohms is NOT the max permissible..
just guidance where it MAY be unstable!)
IF it is going to be in use a lot of hours per day I may do a bit more..
but my gut feeling is the risks on a WOODEN SHED with no extraneous parts are not that much more than an extension lead up the garden plugged in at the house.
:C