Probably, but if you have one fitted they can't use it against you. Ie you took all reasonable precautionsIf you've ever seen what a lightning strike does to a house, I seriously doubt a SPD will help much
Probably, but if you have one fitted they can't use it against you. Ie you took all reasonable precautionsIf you've ever seen what a lightning strike does to a house, I seriously doubt a SPD will help much
Type AC at that.A few years ago a lightning strike hit a Virgin media cabinet locally ….. and took out many routers and tv’s
SPDs on the incoming mains wouldn’t have helped at all
SPD‘s are simply part of the stitch up between jpel and the manufacturers to add changes to the regs to justify amendments and line the pockets of the manufacturers.
in the OP’s case, he has RCD protection on all circuits and that’s enough for a sensible spark to crack on with additions / changes
Type AC at that.
The fact of the matter is they would not be considered suitable that's what. Moaning about the scribes who put together BS7671 really doesn't help. It wasn't so long ago additional RCD protection wasn't so prevalent as it is now but you put it in place without too much thought.So what?
Customers really do think we are ripping them off already
The fact of the matter is they would not be considered suitable that's what. Moaning about the scribes who put together BS7671 really doesn't help. It wasn't so long ago additional RCD protection wasn't so prevalent as it is now but you put it in place without too much thought.
I've seen the first hand the damage a lightning strike caused in a hospital 20 odd years agoIf you've ever seen what a lightning strike does to a house, I seriously doubt a SPD will help much
Did somebody mention beer I could be local in a couple of hoursCan I just say (Sorry it's slightly off topic), that this sort of thread with the knowledge and experience shared by the likes of Fleeting, Murdoch, Binky, Kerching, Special Location, Mort2367 and UNG is priceless. What a wealth of knowledge you guys have accrued, I take my hat off to you all. Well done, if you were local to me i'd buy you a drink (happily youre not though )
But using that argument what if you don't have the right one fitted have you taken reasonable precautions thenProbably, but if you have one fitted they can't use it against you. Ie you took all reasonable precautions
Having seen so often the fit an SPD and just from this thread alone the expectations of the performance of an SPD does anybody actually understand the limitations of what they are fitting given the different types of SPD available. A little bit of reading https://www.surgedevices.co.uk/2346-2/ quite simply explains SPD's and a type 1+2+3 SPD for single phase starts at around £250 for the basic lighning protection level carry on to level 1 and you are significantly adding to the cost of a board change. So how many are misselling type 2 SPD's as protecting against lightning strikes
But what LPL is it providingThe funny thing is,,,, I’m fitting a T1,2,3 SPD tomorrow,,,, I got that surge one for just under £150 inc VAT…… still expensive compared to a standard T2
We are trying to give the consumer some protection against a constantly outdated and failing network infrastructure.
But what LPL is it providing
You can't actually protect against a direct lightning strike, only surges in the network from strikes near a property. The infrastructure has been naff for years, but you don't see lots of failed appliances, which makes me wonder how necessary they are.We all assume that we fit them for lightening strikes, when the domestic ones fitted by manufacturers in consumer units are not for that.
Lightening protection is a specialist thing. The basic type 2 fitted by manufacturers gives some protection against surges from the network.
I think we got hung up on the original risk assessment that mentioned strikes as part of its formula.
We are trying to give the consumer some protection against a constantly outdated and failing network infrastructure.
That is all as mere electricians we can do.
@johnb2713 thanks for the beer. You are right there is a wealth of knowledge on here and I as I did on this topic today am more than happy to learn something new from others.
Everyday can be a schoolday.
If you don't read the contract you have with your insurance company how is it their fault?True,but they will have slipper something in in the small print that no one reads that means your not covered without one.
Any excuse not to pay out.
By hiding such things in small print, it's obvious at times they dont want to draw you attention to their get-out clauses.If you don't read the contract you have with your insurance company how is it their fault?
and they can and do try it on. We had a car fire resulting in a right off, I had declared the value at what we paid £7,500. The insurance company offer was £6200 'book price', I argued with them, in the end summoned them to small claims court. They showed the judge glasses guide for price which was correct, I argued that a) I couldn't buy at that price anywhere and b) they accepted my submitted valuation. The judge ruled they had 7 days to find me a car or they and to cough up. I received their payment of £7500 on the 7th day.Insurance companies can only refuse to pay out if there is fraud involved, either in the application for insurance or a false claim,
Have you noticed how this is a one way street, if you over insured, they still wouldnt pay extra.they can however reduce any claim due to being under insured
Oh they definitely do, you're naïve to suggest they dont.you have a contract with the insurance company that they can not wiggle out of, most reputable insurance companies don't even try
If you worked with the ombudsman on claims not being paid, surely that was as a result of customer referring a matter to the ombudsman of an insurance company not paying?, but will employ an assessors/specialist to verify the claim if they feel the claim is dubious I worked with the Insurance Ombudsman on many claims and not one was ever not paid.
Yes, but why did they get as far as the ombudsman before being paid?If you don't read the contract you have with your insurance company how is it their fault?
Insurance companies can only refuse to pay out if there is fraud involved, either in the application for insurance or a false claim, they can however reduce any claim due to being under insured, you have a contract with the insurance company that they can not wiggle out of, most reputable insurance companies don't even try, but will employ an assessors/specialist to verify the claim if they feel the claim is dubious I worked with the Insurance Ombudsman on many claims and not one was ever not paid.
Enter your email address to join: