The second PIR should not have been issued unless it was a different contractor, it should have been an EIC. There are basic fundamental mistakes on every single page, most of the mistakes have been spotted by the forum members. The biggest mistake this contractor has made is that he has no concept of the legal position his initial PIR has placed him in. Under his advise Mr slim has had remedial works carried out at a substantial cost to himself. My own opinion of this fiasco is that I believe Mr Slim has a right of complaint, under the terms of enrolment with the NICEIC , the contractor has a duty of care, not only to carry out his day to day business with integrity, but to uphold the image and reputation of the NICEIC themselves. I will say one thing about this, if anyone carries out any PIR's and gives advise to change or upgrade anything, remember this thread, its one of the reasons to do everything right the first time, it could cost you a small fortune, if you do anything as badly as this.
I am so glad that this thread was started, its probably been the best learning tool I have seen regarding the topic of PIR's, and has highlighted the multitude of problems when they are carried out incorrectly.