Hi Reference the CU change.I am a registered electrician with NAPIT,and the normal procedure is to carry out a full periodic inspection before changing the CUnit.You need to inspect the installation first. Whether you actually issue a PIR to the client is between you and him/her. Think about it.If you're fitting a new 17th edition unit (which I'm sure you will be) any insulation problems could well cause rcd trippling. There might be broken rings,disconnected earthing connections and much more.You shouldn't be connecting up an unsafe installation.Also you SHOULD be completing an Electrical Installation Cert. You need all the information from carrying out the PIR to complete your EIC. One more thing, the work is notifiable to the local authority.
Take care,you could end up with a very heavy fine or a jail term !!!!!
Best regards Speedster.
---------- AUTO MERGE Post added at 08:39 ---------- Previous post was at 08:34 ----------
Hi, Forgot to mention,obviously any faults found should be rectified before going any further.
Speedster.
In an ideal world what you suggest would be all nice and hunky dory..
But this idealistic procedure has two key problems;
a) You will not get any jobs because you are quoting too high because you have to try and cover all bases & possibilities.
B) You will end up cutting corners and not doing a quality job because you realise half-way through the work that you are not going to make any money out of the job.
But as we live and work in the REAL world The reality is.... After consultation and discussion, we will do what the customer is willing to pay you to do. The idea that you can put right all anomalies you find on an installation is actually an unrealistic and unprofitable business model.
Also some of your arguments are misguided and actually contradict themseleves...
Think about it:-
An installation which by your definition is unsafe therefore you cannot put a new CU on... Is ALREADY in service, and probably has been for several years!!!!
So by your argument it is safer to leave an installation which has a few areas that require improvement with an older CU that can only detect overload..
rather than improve the same installation with a CU that can detect BOTH overload AND electric shock!? hmm fuzzy logic??
Generally it is more than a bit of poor insulation that causes RCD's to trip
There are numerous insulation problems that will NEVER trip an RCD.
Consider; for 30ma to flow (& trip RCD) we are looking at approx 7,666ohms or LESS continuity between earth & a 'L' or 'N'. This is considerably less than the 0.5Meg, (500,000ohms) Minimum acceptable. Again in the real world any single digit Megohm insulation readings would be requiring a bit of further investigation but will not be an immediate RCD problem. 9.0Meg thro to 1.0Meg are 900,000ohms and 100,000ohms which are ridiculously small leakage currents.. No RCD trips!
Most often there are dodgy appliances, borrowed neutrals etc.. causing RCD problems on CU changes.
Where rewiring of circuits is not practical, it is acceptable to reconnect circuits with no earthing.. Such as early lighting circuits wired in twin with no CPC. You make sure all accessories are class II and appropriate warning labels are fitted... etc..
It is quite possible to fill out an EIC without doing a PIR. and some electrical improvement work HAS to be done in stages because the customer has a limited budget.
These are a few illustrations of the difference between the text-book ideal world CU change.. and the reality of running a business, meeting customers requirements in the real world.
As always we should use these best scenario guidance notes etc..
but balance with a level headed, experienced, qualified judgment, with good dollop of practical common sense thrown in to evaluate on how to improve an installations safety within the customers budget.
:coffee