Badger Cymru
Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2017
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 1
Hi all,
We've recently had our 1910's property completely rewired. Following the re-plaster, one of the new cables between a wall light and the switch didn't work when connected up. Our electrician 'resolved' this by feeding another new cable through the side of the nearby doorframe to avoid re-chasing and re-plastering the short section. We weren't given a choice - he just did it. He's knocked out two holes in the new plaster on the other side of the wall alongside the door frame (architrave is currently missing) in order to feed a new cable across from the wall light, down the side of the doorframe and back across to the switch.
He reckons it's safe and it has actually already passed the safety test, but my concern is that the cable is in an unexpected place and could easily be caught by an unwittingly-long screw (e.g. by us or a future homeowner). Even though it's RCD protected, it would mean removing architrave to replace the wire if it were caught. He's not listening to any arguments about 'safe zones' and insists that it's fine as it complies with all current regulations. He likens it to cables behind skirting boards underneath sockets/switches but my argument is that cables are expected there, but not behind door frames. He also says that it's not his fault, although it's unclear who's fault he thinks it actually is (seems highly unlikely that the new cable damaged from the outset and the plasterer did any damage to trunked cables).
My impression is that he just simply just doesn't want to make the correction and now just wants his full invoice paid. However, we have held back 5% of full payment as we want this corrected, but is he correct? If not, is there anything additional I can say to him to convince him otherwise? Is there any official statement I can quote to back up my arguments? I've looked already but haven't found anything definitive. Should he be footing the bill for the cost to do this the 'proper' way, including the re-plastering? I really don't want to appear difficult, but it really doesn't feel right that a brand new rewire that removed decades of dodgy wiring, and cost nearly £5k, should contain this sort of oddity.
Thanks in advance.
We've recently had our 1910's property completely rewired. Following the re-plaster, one of the new cables between a wall light and the switch didn't work when connected up. Our electrician 'resolved' this by feeding another new cable through the side of the nearby doorframe to avoid re-chasing and re-plastering the short section. We weren't given a choice - he just did it. He's knocked out two holes in the new plaster on the other side of the wall alongside the door frame (architrave is currently missing) in order to feed a new cable across from the wall light, down the side of the doorframe and back across to the switch.
He reckons it's safe and it has actually already passed the safety test, but my concern is that the cable is in an unexpected place and could easily be caught by an unwittingly-long screw (e.g. by us or a future homeowner). Even though it's RCD protected, it would mean removing architrave to replace the wire if it were caught. He's not listening to any arguments about 'safe zones' and insists that it's fine as it complies with all current regulations. He likens it to cables behind skirting boards underneath sockets/switches but my argument is that cables are expected there, but not behind door frames. He also says that it's not his fault, although it's unclear who's fault he thinks it actually is (seems highly unlikely that the new cable damaged from the outset and the plasterer did any damage to trunked cables).
My impression is that he just simply just doesn't want to make the correction and now just wants his full invoice paid. However, we have held back 5% of full payment as we want this corrected, but is he correct? If not, is there anything additional I can say to him to convince him otherwise? Is there any official statement I can quote to back up my arguments? I've looked already but haven't found anything definitive. Should he be footing the bill for the cost to do this the 'proper' way, including the re-plastering? I really don't want to appear difficult, but it really doesn't feel right that a brand new rewire that removed decades of dodgy wiring, and cost nearly £5k, should contain this sort of oddity.
Thanks in advance.