My bad then, I thought you were referring to t=kNot sure I follow Steve, I draw out Adiabatic lines for various cables, this allows me to see if the thermal constraints have been met for all conductors.
My bad then, I thought you were referring to t=kNot sure I follow Steve, I draw out Adiabatic lines for various cables, this allows me to see if the thermal constraints have been met for all conductors.
My bad then, I thought you were referring to t=k
Show me your worked example and let me pick the fruits from your tree, but if they are sour i will spit them back out again:|Wrong tree again.
You need to satisfy yourself that the thermal constraints are met, instead of referencing other publications, use BS7671 Chapter 43.Show me your worked example and let me pick the fruits from your tree, but if they are sour i will spit them back out again:|
I believe chapter 43 to be quite clear with regard to thermal constraints, I don't intend to do a worked example, but do feel free if your bored. .I asked for an example earlier but got ignored - to be or not to be ROTFWL I have even answered his Rod questions cos i was bored :slap
---------- Post Auto-Merged at 22:07 ---------- Previous post was made at 22:04 ----------
Forgot to say, its probably not only reading chapter 43 but the interpretation of it.....
(Then again after recent threads perhaps chapter 43 should say 43.1 If Cable is rated at the Current and does not get hot then its fine to use :slap )
And LINE conductors.Steve, chapter 43 deals with live conductors, the faults between live conductors.
kA line conductor is a live conductor. Your k2 S2 will differ.
Both cables are 2.5, and the k values may differ.
Nicky,Well im disappointed with you all............so many of you come on here saying they are here to educate those that dont quite understand, for eg sidewinder(no offence) yet no-one is willing to show any working out for the above problem.As i have shown above, the example of 115A for a short should not really exist due to volt drop regs, and it is L/N we are talking about and not cpc/Zs here.
I think the adiabatic is not that simple to use in equations without other factors coming into force...ie it states in the regs that the equation is adequately correct for trip times of less than 0.1 seconds only.
So come on, EDUCATE:Neil
Enter your email address to join: