I`m somewhere inbetween on this one, guys. However:The only problem with pme is if you loose the neutral but if the shed has a rcd fitted it would detect the imbalance in the live and neutral so would disconnect.I do understand what you are saying step but in my 20 years experience I have never came across a lost neutral on the supply but i have come across loads of high reading (ra) rods and malfunctioning rcds.also if you did loose the neutral on the supply it is staked down to earth in multiple places along its length the only problem would be if you lost it from your installation to the joint in the road or over head.what are the chances of that (slim).as for Code1 I think your are being a bit over the top
Cheggers, m8: on the one hand "It`s ok `cos the rcd is here!", then "I`ve had many malfunctioning rcd`s"!!!
Ergo, it isn`t safe to rely on one, which is why the big book soecifically states NOT relying on an RCD alone.
As Steptoe, I`ve seen a couple of cases of dropped or defective PEN conductors - and they can be REALLY spooky!
BUT:
I would not be coding an exported PME as a code 1 necessarily - although it WOULD be coded.
n.b. Why would you NOT drop the PME connection to the catenary? Where do you find any reg, or guidance, which suggests this as a good practice?
Apache: Calculated risk is acceptable; but if we allow something, which later causes a problem; even if the problem can be laid at the feet of the suppliers, they`ll come for us, `cos we`re easier targets.
Cheggers: You can start a "poll" thread yourself m8, it doesn`t need to be done by admin(s)