Sharpend
"It Just Is"
So road tax is seemingly nothing to do with emissions??
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63660321
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63660321
Buy a bicycle, that's simpleNothing like making it simple to understand.
And that certainly is nothing like simple.
More and more 'affordable' EV's coming onto the market, of course you can also buy a used EV instead of a new ICE too. You then reap the rewards and help the environment.But of-course most EV's are outside of the budget for the majority of the population?
So those what can buy... should be able to afford the tax anyway?
More and more 'affordable' EV's coming onto the market, of course you can also buy a used EV instead of a new ICE too.
You then reap the rewards and help the environment.
I dont agree, look around at the new reg cars around, each and every one of them could have been a used EVUsed EV's are way out the pockets of 75% of the population
Of course it will but even so, the fuel is much cheaper and the traction system way more efficient.Hum - the huge hole being created by the reduction of fuel duties will have to be filled soon
Of course it will but even so, the fuel is much cheaper and the traction system way more efficient.
To counter that, ICE vehicles need fuel, that fuel is delivered to petrol stations via lorries that will do far more road damage than EV's so your argument is countered. In addition, fluids leaked from ICE and brake dust etc also contaminates the road surface.EV's are typically far heavier than ICE's and therefore likely to cause more road damage
To counter that, ICE vehicles need fuel, that fuel is delivered to petrol stations via lorries that will do far more road damage than EV's so your argument is countered. In addition, fluids leaked from ICE and brake dust etc also contaminates the road surface.
This is largely a myth, my current EV weighs in at almost exactly the same as my last comparably sized Petrol car.EV's are typically far heavier than ICE's and therefore likely to cause more road damage
If we fail to mitigate the effects of climate change, we will all end up paying out for additional damage to infrastructure, flooding of property, via higher insurance costs and higher food costs.Hum - the huge hole being created by the reduction of fuel duties will have to be filled soon
To counter that, ICE vehicles need fuel, that fuel is delivered to petrol stations via lorries that will do far more road damage than EV's so your argument is countered. In addition, fluids leaked from ICE and brake dust etc also contaminates the road surface.
Well if I don't boot it, I can drive 320 miles in cold, wet, winter weather if needed before stopping, closer to 400 in summer. This isn't the problem many think it is anymore.The infra structure for refueling ICE is already in place, including in rural and remote places..
EV charging hasn't even started to scratch the surface for sufficient recharging within areas of higher population density.
So even if you wanted to.. currently you physically cannot get the range flexibility -vs- the refueling time, if you needed to make any longer journey at short notice.
More and more 'affordable' EV's coming onto the market, of course you can also buy a used EV instead of a new ICE too. You then reap the rewards and help the environment.
Enter your email address to join: